Combustion and Emissions Characteristics of the Turbine Engine Fueled with HEFA Blends from Different Feedstocks

Gawron, Bartosz; Białecki, Tomasz; Janicka, Anna; Suchocki, Tomasz

doi:10.3390/en13051277

Cited by 32 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Consequently, the standard deviations of the thrust, in absolute values, for the entire measuring range do not change significantly, while their relative values are the greater the smaller the thrust generated by the TG. A similar relationship between the measurement uncertainty of TSFC and the engine load was reported in [35].…”

Section: Working Parameters Tgsupporting

confidence: 79%

Effect of Adding Emulsifier to Fuel on Work Efficiency and Gas Turbine Emissions

Niszczota

Gieras

2021

Energies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In an effort to reduce the emissivity of transport and energy, numerous studies are being carried out on the impact of the combustion of alternative fuels on the emission and operating parameters of propulsion and energy units. One of the observed trends is the use of emulsion fuels. The addition of an emulsifier to an emulsion fuel reduces the interfacial tension between two liquids, which allows obtaining an emulsion fuel with the expected stability. The research conducted on self-ignition engines and gas turbines (TG) does not give an unambiguous answer as to the influence of the use of fuel-water emulsion on CO emissions. One of the reasons for the discrepancy in the obtained results may be the type and amount of the emulsifier used in the emulsion fuel. Tests were carried out on the GTM-120 gas turbine to compare the operating parameters and emissions between the cases in which TG was supplied with three fuel mixtures—the standard fuel for TG (DF) and DF with 2% and 5% emulsifier addition. It was shown that the addition of 2% of the emulsifier to DF causes an increase in CO emission, with the remaining measured parameters unchanged. On the other hand, increasing the amount of emulsifier in DF to 5% reduces CO emissions to the level observed in the case in which DF was burned reduces NOx emissions and reduces the thermal efficiency of TG.

show abstract

Section: Working Parameters Tgsupporting

confidence: 79%

Effect of Adding Emulsifier to Fuel on Work Efficiency and Gas Turbine Emissions

Niszczota

Gieras

2021

Energies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, in this work, the absolute values of the parameters were less important than their relative changes in response to the increased biocomponent ratio. The test bench is equipped with a portable GA60 gas analyzer (Figure 3) which was used in previous emission research [26][27][28]. Exhaust gases are sampled from the engine nozzle using a probe and delivered through a heated exhaust hose to the instrument.…”

Section: Gtm-140 Microturbinementioning

confidence: 99%

Performance and Emissions of a Microturbine and Turbofan Powered by Alternative Fuels

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Alternative fuels containing biocomponents produced in various technologies are introduced in aviation to reduce its carbon footprint but there is little data describing their impact on the performance and emissions of engines. The purpose of the work is to compare the performance and gas emissions produced from two different jet engines—the GTM-140 microturbine and the full-size DGEN380 turbofan, powered by blends of Jet A-1 and one of two biocomponents: (1) Alcohol-to-Jet (ATJ) and (2) Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA) produced from used cooking oil (UCO) in various concentrations. The acquired data will be used to develop an engine emissivity model to predict gas emissions. Blends of the mineral fuel with synthetic components were prepared in various concentrations, and their physicochemical parameters were examined in the laboratory. Measurements of emissions from both engines were carried out in selected operating points using the Semtech DS gaseous analyzer and the EEPS spectrometer. The impact of tested blends on engine operating parameters is limited, and their use does not carry the risk of a significant decrease in aircraft performance or increase in fuel consumption. Increasing the content of biocomponents causes a noticeable rise in the emission of CO and slight increase for some other gasses (HC and NOx), which should not, however, worsen the working conditions of the ground personnel. This implies that there are no contraindications against using tested blends for fuelling gas-turbine engines.

show abstract

“…To associate the differences with some fuel characteristics, the model of engine and its control system is necessary. For example, when using ATJ, a slight increase in exhaust gas temperature (EGT) was observed with the increasing ratio of the biocomponent (Figure 27), but a similar trend was not observed for HEFA (28).…”

Section: Turbofanmentioning

confidence: 83%

“…The test bench is equipped with a portable GA60 gas analyzer ( Figure 3) which was used in previous emission research [26][27][28]. Exhaust gases are sampled from the engine nozzle using a probe and delivered through a heated exhaust hose to the instrument.…”

Section: Gtm-140 Microturbinementioning

confidence: 99%

Performance and Emissions of a Microturbine and Turbofan Powered by Alternative Fuels

Przysowa¹,

Gawron²,

Białecki³

et al. 2020

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Alternative fuels containing biocomponents produced in various technologies are introduced in aviation to reduce its carbon footprint but there is little data describing their impact on the performance and emissions of engines. The purpose of the work is to compare the performance and gas emissions produced from two different jet engines: the GTM-140 microturbine and the full-size DGEN380 turbofan, powered by blends of Jet A-1 and one of two biocomponents: 1) ATJ and 2) HEFA produced from used cooking oil (UCO) in various concentrations. The acquired data will be used to develop an engine emissivity model to predict gas emissions. Blends of the mineral fuel with synthetic components were prepared in various concentrations, and their physicochemical parameters were examined in the laboratory. Measurements of emissions from both engines were carried out in selected operating points using the Semtech DS gaseous analyzer and the EEPS spectrometer. The impact of tested blends on engine operating parameters is limited, and their use does not carry the risk of a significant decrease in aircraft performance or increase in fuel consumption. Increasing the content of biocomponents causes a noticeable rise in the emission of CO and slight increase for some other gasses (HC and NOx), which should not, however, worsen the working conditions of the ground personnel. This implies that there are no contraindications against using tested blends for fuelling gas-turbine engines.

show abstract

Combustion and Emissions Characteristics of the Turbine Engine Fueled with HEFA Blends from Different Feedstocks

Cited by 32 publications

References 27 publications

Effect of Adding Emulsifier to Fuel on Work Efficiency and Gas Turbine Emissions

Effect of Adding Emulsifier to Fuel on Work Efficiency and Gas Turbine Emissions

Performance and Emissions of a Microturbine and Turbofan Powered by Alternative Fuels

Performance and Emissions of a Microturbine and Turbofan Powered by Alternative Fuels

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About