2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-26528-1_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combustion process optimization for oxymethylene ether fuels in a heavy‑duty application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 shows the temperature contours for the diesel reference diesel case, the baseline OME case (with the same geometry of the initial diesel engine) using OME as fuel and the best case obtained from the optimization. Mainly, the changes in the bowl profile increases the distance between the nozzle hole outlet and the walls of the piston bowl, which is in agreement with previous studies [17,14], that presented larger combustion chambers when oxygenated fuels are used due to the longer mixing lengths for those fuel sprays. In addition, the optimized case exhibits a faster jet penetration, which occurs due to bigger orifice diameters and higher injection pressure.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13 shows the temperature contours for the diesel reference diesel case, the baseline OME case (with the same geometry of the initial diesel engine) using OME as fuel and the best case obtained from the optimization. Mainly, the changes in the bowl profile increases the distance between the nozzle hole outlet and the walls of the piston bowl, which is in agreement with previous studies [17,14], that presented larger combustion chambers when oxygenated fuels are used due to the longer mixing lengths for those fuel sprays. In addition, the optimized case exhibits a faster jet penetration, which occurs due to bigger orifice diameters and higher injection pressure.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Most of previous studies done with these fuels have been carried out for pre-existing conventional engine architectures, however recent studies report that the performance could be further improved by adapting the combustion system configuration to the chemical requirements of this renewable fuel. In this regard, Gaukel et al [14] reported an experimental and computational study on an engine fueled with OME, where they tested 10 different piston bowl shape configurations. From all the bowl piston configurations that were evaluated, they found a combination that reduced the NO x emissions and maintained the indicated efficiency at the same time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of a bigger bottom-bowl radius are the idea behind V4. Geometries V5 and V6 consist of a wider bowl diameter to realize a more uniform temperature field and, therefore, less CO emissions [6,34].Piston-bowl geometry V7 is making use of a deeper bowl, which showed good results regarding piston work and UHC emissions in [35]. The last piston-bowl geometry V8 is a combination of V4 and V5.…”
Section: Geometry Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%