2014
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COMET: adaptive context-based modeling for ultrafast HIV-1 subtype identification

Abstract: Viral sequence classification has wide applications in clinical, epidemiological, structural and functional categorization studies. Most existing approaches rely on an initial alignment step followed by classification based on phylogenetic or statistical algorithms. Here we present an ultrafast alignment-free subtyping tool for human immunodeficiency virus type one (HIV-1) adapted from Prediction by Partial Matching compression. This tool, named COMET, was compared to the widely used phylogeny-based REGA and S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
254
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 320 publications
(261 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
254
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…On one hand, Stanford-v8.1 showed excellent performance in sensitivity (97.4% to 100%) on other pure subtypes (D, F1, and F2) in contrast to other rapid tools (reporting Ͻ90% sensitivity); this indicates that Stanford-v8.1 might be acceptable in assigning D or F strains. On the other hand, only COMET or REGA-v3 might be acceptable in assigning viruses as subtype A1 or G, respectively (27,29). Regarding the sensitivity to recombinant forms, Stanford-v8.1 appeared highly reliable in assigning CRF01_AE, CRF02_AG, CRF06_cpx, CRF11_cpx, and CRF36_cpx.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On one hand, Stanford-v8.1 showed excellent performance in sensitivity (97.4% to 100%) on other pure subtypes (D, F1, and F2) in contrast to other rapid tools (reporting Ͻ90% sensitivity); this indicates that Stanford-v8.1 might be acceptable in assigning D or F strains. On the other hand, only COMET or REGA-v3 might be acceptable in assigning viruses as subtype A1 or G, respectively (27,29). Regarding the sensitivity to recombinant forms, Stanford-v8.1 appeared highly reliable in assigning CRF01_AE, CRF02_AG, CRF06_cpx, CRF11_cpx, and CRF36_cpx.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These tools have different characteristics in inferring subtypes (26). In particular, because REGA-v3 and SCUEAL are phylogenetics-based tools, their computation times are longer than those of other tools that are based on a statistical (COMET) or similarity (Stanford HIVdb) approach (24,26,28,29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subtype classification was performed using COMET. 27 Non-B clusters with multiple potential transmission partners within the United States were subjected to molecular clock analysis in a Bayesian Markov-chain Monte Carlo framework in BEAST v1.8.0. 28,29 Each molecular clock analysis was run for 10,000,000 generations, sampling every 2,500 generations.…”
Section: Phylogenetics and Molecular Clock Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HCV genotypes and subtypes were assigned using the Oxford HCV automated subtyping tool version 2 (Alcantara et al, 2009;De Oliveira et al, 2005), COMET (Struck et al, 2014) and by manual phylogenetic analysis using reference sequences from the Los Alamos HCV sequence database (Kuiken et al, 2008). Sequences were aligned against reference sequence H77 (NC_004102) using an in-house developed codon aware alignment tool (Cuypers et al, 2015).…”
Section: Subtypingmentioning
confidence: 99%