1980
DOI: 10.1038/284022a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cometary collisions on the Moon and Mercury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
113
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mid-infrared Diviner data presented here place tight constraints on the swirl formation process and must be accounted for by any proposed swirl formation mechanism. The proposed feldspathic dust lofting 7 , meteoroid/comet swarm [4][5][6] and hybrid 41 swirl formation mechanisms would likely result in thermophysical and spectral properties that are inconsistent with the Diviner measurements. The proposed dust lofting and hybrid processes cannot account for the observed CF shift in Diviner data while the meteoroid/comet swarm and hybrid processes cause regolith disturbance that would result in a substantial thermal anomaly in the night-time Diviner data.…”
Section: Article Nature Communications | Doi: 101038/ncomms7189mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mid-infrared Diviner data presented here place tight constraints on the swirl formation process and must be accounted for by any proposed swirl formation mechanism. The proposed feldspathic dust lofting 7 , meteoroid/comet swarm [4][5][6] and hybrid 41 swirl formation mechanisms would likely result in thermophysical and spectral properties that are inconsistent with the Diviner measurements. The proposed dust lofting and hybrid processes cannot account for the observed CF shift in Diviner data while the meteoroid/comet swarm and hybrid processes cause regolith disturbance that would result in a substantial thermal anomaly in the night-time Diviner data.…”
Section: Article Nature Communications | Doi: 101038/ncomms7189mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Discussion Previous spectroscopic observations of the swirls at visible and near-infrared wavelengths have been used to argue for the solar wind standoff model 3,14,24 , the micrometeoroid/comet swarm model [4][5][6] or the feldspathic dust pile model. More recently, M 3 spectra have been used to propose a hybrid model for swirl formation that invokes both regolith disturbance and dust lofting 41 .…”
Section: Article Nature Communications | Doi: 101038/ncomms7189mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alternative hypothesis suggests that Reiner Gamma and other swirls on the far side of the Moon are the imprints of one or more recent cometary impacts (Schultz and Srnka 1980a ;Srnka and Schultz 1980;Schultz et al 1980). According to this model, streamers of gas and/or dust in the inner coma struck the lunar surface at high velocity and produced major changes in the upper regolith.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The creation of an antipodal magnetic anomaly may involve the amplification of existing magnetic fields by the expanding vapor-melt cloud in a large impact (Hood and Artemieva, 2008), or shock effects of converging ejecta (Hood et al, 2013). Lunar swirls (e.g., El-Baz, 1972;Schultz, 1976;Hood and Schubert, 1980;Schultz and Srnka, 1980;Hood and Williams, 1989;Blewett et al, 2011;Garrick-Bethell et al, 2011;Kramer et al, 2011a,b) are high-reflectance markings with diffuse edges and no measurable topographic expression. According to the solar-wind standoff model for lunar swirls (Hood and Schubert, 1980), the presence of a crustal magnetic anomaly leads to deflection of solar-wind ions, thus protecting the surface from the normal lunar space-weathering process that causes darkening and reddening of freshly exposed material (see Hapke, 2001 for a review of the effects and causes of lunar-style space weathering).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%