Comfortably Numb? Researchers’ Satisfaction with the Publication System and a Proposal for Radical Change

Abstract

In this preregistered study we evaluate current attitudes towards, and experiences with, publishing research and propose an alternative system of publishing. Our main hypothesis is that researchers tend to become institutionalized, such that they are generally discontent with the current publication system, but that this dissatisfaction fades over time as they become tenured. A survey was distributed to the first authors of papers published in four recent issues of top-15 Work and Organizational Psychology (WOP) journals. Even among this positively biased sample, we found that the time it takes to publish a manuscript is negatively associated with whether authors perceive this time to be justifiable and worthwhile relative to the amount their manuscript has changed. Review quality and tenure buffer the negative relationship with perceived justifiability, but not for perceived worth. The findings suggest that untenured (WOP) researchers are dissatisfied with the publishing times of academic journals, which adds to the pile of criticisms of the journal-based publication system. Since publishing times are inherent to the journal-based publication system, we suggest that incremental improvements may not sufficiently address the problems associated with publishing times. We therefore propose the adoption of a modular publication system to improve (WOP) publishing experiences.

Some Issues on the Funding of the Scientific Publication in Open Access

“…In the current higher education context, there is enormous pressure on academics to publish, both for professional reasons and for the institutional position of their institution (Kortabarria, 2020;Aliukonis, Poškutė, & Gefenas, 2020;Abbott, 2018;van Dijk & van Zelst, 2020). According to Kortabarria (2020), with the pressure materialised by the expression "publish-or-perish" (used for the first time in a non-academic context by Harold Jefferson Coolidge, in his 1932 book Life and Letters, by Archibald Cary Coolidge, but which eventually became popular in the academic environment (Rawat & Meena, 2014), academics have no option but to " [...] publish in a closed online environment -such as their institutional repository [...] -or in a universal, well-established and very reputable, but increasingly onerous or even, for some, prohibitive journal" (Kortabarria, 2020, p. 224).…”