Comicboarding

Moraveji, Neema; Li, Jason; Ding, Jiarong; O'Kelley, Patrick; Woolf, Suze

doi:10.1145/1240624.1240832

Cited by 92 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Comic boarding was originally developed to promote participatory design among children by providing an on-site artist to illustrate ideas as they are mentioned and draw storyboards [24]. Our study, by testing this technique among older adults, provides evidence that the comic boarding technique may be applied to other social groups that also have limited participatory design experience.…”

Section: Co-design Methodsmentioning

confidence: 83%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Co-designing an e-health tutorial for older adults

Xie

Yeh

Walsh

et al. 2012

Proceedings of the 2012 iConference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Older adults' ability to access and use electronic health information is generally low, requiring innovative approaches for improvement. An integrated e-tutorial overlays instructions onto Websites. The literature suggests integrated e-tutorials are more effective than paper or video-based tutorials for younger people, but little is known about their effectiveness for older adults. This study explores the applicability of an integrated e-health tutorial for older adults. An integrated e-tutorial, the Online Tutorial Overlay Presenter (OnTOP), added an instructional overlay to the NIHSeniorHealth.gov Website. Overlay features were examined in seven participatory design sessions with seven older adults. Participatory design techniques were used to elicit participants' preferences for tutorial features. Three themes emerged: 1) using contextual cues; 2) tailoring to the learner's literacy level; and 3) enhancing interfaces with multimedia cues. These findings improved the design features of OnTOP. They also generated empirical evidence about the effects of multimedia learning among older adults.

show abstract

Section: Co-design Methodsmentioning

confidence: 83%

“…After using the prototype, we led participants through a co-design activity modeled after comic boarding [24]. Comic boarding is a participatory design technique where children with little participatory design experience describe their ideas to an artist who renders them to paper.…”

Section: Figure 2 Participants Testing An Ontop Prototypementioning

confidence: 99%

Co-designing an e-health tutorial for older adults

Xie

Yeh

Walsh

et al. 2012

Proceedings of the 2012 iConference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Mutual learning is one goal or one definition of participation stated by certain participatory designers (Baumgartner et al 2002; Winschiers-Theophilus et al 2010; Ai 2019). Another common goal or definition of participation is eliciting the community’s perspective (Moraveji et al 2007; Neves 2014; Rajamany et al 2022). Other goals are greater ownership or facilitating better outcomes and change (Chirowodza et al 2009; Yasuoka & Sakurai 2012; Alves Villarinho Lima & Almeida 2021).…”

Section: Literature Review Of Problemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An introduction to radical participatory design: decolonising participatory design processes

Udoewa

2022

Des. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Outside of community-led design projects, most participatory design processes initiated by a company or organisation maintain or even strengthen power imbalances between the design organisation and the community on whose purported behalf they are designing, further increasing the absencing experience. Radical participatory design (RPD) is a radically relational answer to the coloniality inherent in participatory design where the community members’ disappointment is greater due to the greater expectations and presencing potential of a ‘participatory design’ process. We introduce the term RPD to show how research and design processes can be truly participatory to the root or core. Instead of treating participatory design as a method, a way of conducting a method, or a methodology, we introduce RPD as a meta-methodology, a way of doing any methodology. We explicitly describe what participation means and compare and contrast design processes based on the amount of participation, creating a typology of participation. We introduce ‘designer as community member’, ‘community member as designer,’ and ‘community member as facilitator’ models and provide characteristics for the meta-methodology of RPD.

show abstract

“…• using story telling techniques to provide a mechanism through which children can relate their ideas or experiences, as in KidReporter [2], where children participated in making a newspaper about a zoo as a form of requirements gathering for an educational game; or comicboarding [55], where a partially filled comic strip is used to provide the children with a known structure and a narrative direction through which they can present their own ideas…”

Section: Participatory Design With Children: CCImentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this regard, as the authors point out, even structured and relatively constrained activities such as formal training, often practiced in ACI research to show animal participants how to interact with artefacts and to elicit their design preferences, can be regarded as participatory. Similarly, we argue, role play methods and scaffolding approaches, such as comic-boarding [55], employed in CCI research to help children relate to the problem domain and express their ideas, can be regarded as forms of training that are themselves inherently participatory. These methods structure and direct children's engagement with a problem domain, at the same time inviting them to respond and enabling them to engage through their very scaffolding and somewhat constraining function.…”

Section: Pd As Embodied Dialoguementioning

confidence: 99%

P for Politics D for Dialogue

Chisik

Mancini

2019

Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Participatory Design strives to open up the decision-making process and empower all those who may be affected by design. This is opposed to Design as a non-participatory process, in which the power to make decisions is vested in the hands of one group to the possible detriment of others. In this paper we interrogate the nature, possibilities and limitations of Participatory Design through the perspective of Child Computer Interaction (CCI) and Animal Computer Interaction (ACI). Due to the cognitive and communication characteristics, and to the social and legal status of their participants, researchers in these communities have to contend with and challenge existing notions of participation and design. Thus, their theories and practices provide a lens through which the nature and goals of Participatory Design can be examined with a view to facilitating the development of more inclusive participatory models and practices. CCS CONCEPTS • Human-centered computing → Interaction design → Interaction design process and methods → Participatory design

show abstract

Comicboarding

Cited by 92 publications

References 14 publications

Co-designing an e-health tutorial for older adults

Co-designing an e-health tutorial for older adults

An introduction to radical participatory design: decolonising participatory design processes

P for Politics D for Dialogue

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About