Abstract:The process of coming out is important in trying to understand how a lesbian identity is shaped and re-negotiated within various social spaces in South Africa today. The article argues that it is vital to acknowledge the intersectionality of identities and social spaces in order to understand and conceptualise the coming-out process. The article raises the question how lesbian identities are formed over time and argues that the different stages of identity development are influenced by the individual's other o… Show more
“…Downs 2006: 76) themselves as gay men, with pride (cf. Cass 1984: 116;Smuts 2011). Problematic in such an approach, as Plummer concedes, is the fact that these phases and/or stages condone the homogenisation of homosexual experience.…”
Section: Queer Theory: Towards Internal Denaturalisation and Diversitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Research has commented on the seeming 'invisibility' of lesbianism in mainstream heterosexual or homosexual culture and academia (Distiller 2005: 45;Dlamini 2006: 128;Fester 2006: 108;Gevisser 1995: 19;Kowen & Davis 2006: 80;Sanger & Clowes 2006: 38), due to the fact that women were not afforded the freedom of choice relating to sexual intercourse with their husbands or even other women, but found their experiences enmeshed in medical and/ or pathological models of inquiry or even initial exclusion from criminalisation because of their 'denied existence' (Sanger & Clowes 2006: 39). Some researchers focused on how lesbianism does not necessarily pose an immediate threat to heteronormativity, whilst others associated physical violence directed towards particularly black lesbians as an outgrowth of both patriarchal and traditional African culture (Kowen & Davis 2006;Muholi 2004: 118;Ochse 2011;Smuts 2011). These studies identified factors such as pathologisation, abandonment, corrective rape and accusations of witchcraft as impediments in accessing lesbian respondents for research objectives.…”
Section: A Case Of Assimilation and Essentialism: Lesbian And Gay Stumentioning
Lesbian and gay studies emerged in the late 1950s and provided what several academics considered a homogeneous representation of the lesbian and gay community. Based on the critique of this view, queer theory came to the fore during the early 1990s, as a political initiative to highlight the diverse nature of homosexual experiences. Both paradigms heralded indefatigable insights into the lives of these two sexual minorities, yet without a necessary bridge between the homogeneous and the heterogeneous. The objective of the article is to provide a theoretical contemplation of how the manner in which the principles that lesbian and gay studies and queer theory respectively exude, may complement each other so as to offer a link between the 'homogeneous' and the 'diverse', pertaining to the lived experiences of gay men and lesbian women.
“…Downs 2006: 76) themselves as gay men, with pride (cf. Cass 1984: 116;Smuts 2011). Problematic in such an approach, as Plummer concedes, is the fact that these phases and/or stages condone the homogenisation of homosexual experience.…”
Section: Queer Theory: Towards Internal Denaturalisation and Diversitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Research has commented on the seeming 'invisibility' of lesbianism in mainstream heterosexual or homosexual culture and academia (Distiller 2005: 45;Dlamini 2006: 128;Fester 2006: 108;Gevisser 1995: 19;Kowen & Davis 2006: 80;Sanger & Clowes 2006: 38), due to the fact that women were not afforded the freedom of choice relating to sexual intercourse with their husbands or even other women, but found their experiences enmeshed in medical and/ or pathological models of inquiry or even initial exclusion from criminalisation because of their 'denied existence' (Sanger & Clowes 2006: 39). Some researchers focused on how lesbianism does not necessarily pose an immediate threat to heteronormativity, whilst others associated physical violence directed towards particularly black lesbians as an outgrowth of both patriarchal and traditional African culture (Kowen & Davis 2006;Muholi 2004: 118;Ochse 2011;Smuts 2011). These studies identified factors such as pathologisation, abandonment, corrective rape and accusations of witchcraft as impediments in accessing lesbian respondents for research objectives.…”
Section: A Case Of Assimilation and Essentialism: Lesbian And Gay Stumentioning
Lesbian and gay studies emerged in the late 1950s and provided what several academics considered a homogeneous representation of the lesbian and gay community. Based on the critique of this view, queer theory came to the fore during the early 1990s, as a political initiative to highlight the diverse nature of homosexual experiences. Both paradigms heralded indefatigable insights into the lives of these two sexual minorities, yet without a necessary bridge between the homogeneous and the heterogeneous. The objective of the article is to provide a theoretical contemplation of how the manner in which the principles that lesbian and gay studies and queer theory respectively exude, may complement each other so as to offer a link between the 'homogeneous' and the 'diverse', pertaining to the lived experiences of gay men and lesbian women.
“…Jackson and Scott (2010) and Smuts (2011), writing from British and South African perspectives respectively, caution an uncritical view of reflexivity as being only redeeming. One should consider the particular context in which one finds oneself which may necessitate the social (and sexual) actor to engage in a critical selfevaluation and efforts of "impression management" (Goffman 1971).…”
Section: The Reflexive Gay Male On the University Campusmentioning
The article reports on the findings of a qualitative socio logical study conducted between June and December 2012 with 17 selfidentified gay male academics on their experiences in South African tertiary education. Adopting a queer theoretical critique of the process of selfreflexivity, the research focused on how the participants experience homophobia and its influence on their choice to remain in the closet or to disclose their homosexuality. Based on the views of the 15 indepth interviews and two selfadministered questionnaires, three themes associated with gay male academic reflexivity emerged: assimilation, segregation and dualistic transgression. Assimilation assumes the subordination of homosexuality in relation to heterosexuality, segregation the distinction between hetero and homosexuality, whereas dualistic transgression underlines the reciprocal interplay between the first two themes.
“…This is attributed to the fact that they are required to constantly re-enter, re-emerge and re-create new closets based on the contextual allowances or restrictions with which they are confronted (Smuts 2011). Given contextual constraints, some may not be afforded the opportunity to access the necessary material or human resources which are important to master Cass's (1990) identity synthesis or Seidman's (2002: 75) so-called 'post-closeted gay sensibility'.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.