2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0025-7753(03)73643-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comités éticos de investigación clínica y «dictamen único» de los ensayos clínicos multicéntricos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each of these six RECs (all local, belonging to large university hospitals, five of them located in Madrid or Catalonia) reviewed in 2000 and 2001 around 200-300 MCT protocols. 18 In this study, they required 32 and 46 days (medians) for submission to approval and for submission to reception, respectively, being statistically significantly more efficient than the rest of RECs involved in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Each of these six RECs (all local, belonging to large university hospitals, five of them located in Madrid or Catalonia) reviewed in 2000 and 2001 around 200-300 MCT protocols. 18 In this study, they required 32 and 46 days (medians) for submission to approval and for submission to reception, respectively, being statistically significantly more efficient than the rest of RECs involved in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…27 To ensure the fulfilment of this directive requirement, a similar approach to the British one has been proposed in Spain, although the review of the protocol by one REC and that of locality issues by the rest of the RECs involved should run in parallel. 18 The sample of RECs involved in this study can be regarded as an accurate representation of all Spanish RECs: (a) these 62 RECs are located in those regions in which 97% of all clinical trials are performed, 29 This study shows that the median time between submission and approval of a protocol was 48 days; however, the decision reached the sponsor's offices 10 days later (median) and the total median time needed from submission to reception of the approval was 62 days. These figures are very close to those observed in a study performed in the mid 1990s: 46 and 69 days (medians) for submission to approval, and for submission to reception, respectively, 3 but far from those reported in the UK with a median (submission to reception) time between 28 and 42 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation