Command Transitions in Public Administration: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Proactive Strategies

Brown, James C.; Philo, Raymond L.; CallistoJr., Anthony; Smith, Polly J.

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-27844-5_1

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The transformative capacity of public administration requires a methodological framework adapted to investigating institutional practice and changes in institutional design and functionality over time at central and local levels (Rihoux and Grimm, 2006;Creswell, 2014;Brown et al, 2016). In order to conduct a reliable analysis, we structured our research in relation to the four most representative pillars for the organization and coherent functioning of the public administration, presented above.…”

Section: Methodological Framework and Its Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The resizing of public administration and the need for adequate funding continue to pose a challenge for ensuring unitary and efficient mechanisms of control, monitoring and evaluation (Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration, National Agency of Civil Servants, Professional Training Strategy 2016-2020, pp. [6][7][8][9].…”

Section: Good Practicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

"Public Administration Reform in Romania: Assessing the Past and Looking Into the Future"

Profiroiu

NEGOIȚĂ

2022

TRAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

"This article provides an account of the transformational capacity of Romanian public administration in relation to four main aspects: (1) human resource performance and integrity; (2) territorial, functional and institutional decentralization; (3) public policies and (4) capitalizing on the digital and innovative component. The Romania case study highlights the gradual transformation of public administration in the last 30 years, as a reaction to the emergence of economic, social and political crises. For an imperative and irreversible change, we have identified directions for capitalizing on opportunities and good practices in the matter, in the context of the intensified integration process in NATO and the EU. We have analyzed the strategic documents on strengthening and accelerating the transformation of public administration and highlighted the need for the interconnection and interdependence of its four pillars to meet the specific objectives of Horizon 2030. For decision-makers, practitioners and researchers, this article aims to stimulate and contribute to the dedicated public debate and consultation of coherent, predictable and sustainable legislation and practices in the matter."

show abstract

Section: Methodological Framework and Its Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Good Practicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

"Public Administration Reform in Romania: Assessing the Past and Looking Into the Future"

Profiroiu

NEGOIȚĂ

2022

TRAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This analysis of the Romanian context is important to highlight and explain the failed 'model' of public administration reform characterized by poor, unclear, and incoherent regulation. A scrutiny of the legality and constitutionality of public administration reform approaches in Romania, since 1990 until now, requires a methodological framework adapted to the legislative practice and the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court (Brown et al, 2016;Creswell, 2014;Rihoux and Grimm, 2006). In order to precisely analyze the reform, we structured our research based on the three most representative pillars for the organization and coherent functioning of public administration: (1) the Administrative Code, (2) the civil service, and (3) the process of decentralization.…”

Section: Approach and Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Constitutional Court Jurisprudence and Its Role in Shaping Public Administration Reform in Romania

PROFIROIU,

NEGOIȚĂ,

COSTEA

et al. 2024

TRAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article aims to investigate the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court regarding the public administration reform in Romania. We take into consideration the motivation of the public authorities involved in the law-making process, as well as the interpretation of the judges of the Constitutional Court concerning the legislative steps regarding the adoption of an Administrative Code, decentralization, the transfer of competences, the status of civil servants, and finally the legal regime of the newly established or reorganized institutions/authorities. The study also evaluates the steps to reform the public administration concerning the observance of the principles of constitutional loyalty, the separation of powers, the supremacy of the Constitution, and the role of the Parliament.

show abstract

Command Transitions in Public Administration: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Proactive Strategies

Cited by 2 publications

References 9 publications

"Public Administration Reform in Romania: Assessing the Past and Looking Into the Future"

"Public Administration Reform in Romania: Assessing the Past and Looking Into the Future"

Constitutional Court Jurisprudence and Its Role in Shaping Public Administration Reform in Romania

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About