2021
DOI: 10.21805/bzn.v78.a030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment (Case 3767) – Support for the conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793 (currently Parnassius phoebus), and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne), by designation of a neotype

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The title, abstract and keywords of the Case were published on the Commission's website. Four comments supporting the proposal were received from RI Vane-Wright (Vane-Wright, 2021), Z Bálint (Bálint, 2021), OE Kosterin (Kosterin, 2021), M Wiemers (Wiemers, 2021), and one comment opposing the proposal was received from SK Korb (Korb, 2020). In addition, there was an overwhelming 57 statements of support for the Case.…”
Section: History Of Case 3767mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The title, abstract and keywords of the Case were published on the Commission's website. Four comments supporting the proposal were received from RI Vane-Wright (Vane-Wright, 2021), Z Bálint (Bálint, 2021), OE Kosterin (Kosterin, 2021), M Wiemers (Wiemers, 2021), and one comment opposing the proposal was received from SK Korb (Korb, 2020). In addition, there was an overwhelming 57 statements of support for the Case.…”
Section: History Of Case 3767mentioning
confidence: 99%