2005
DOI: 10.1214/088342305000000395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment: Fuzzy and Randomized Confidence Intervals and P-Values

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another commonly used device in dealing with discrete distributions is called (somewhat optimistically) a continuity correction, for example adding or subtracting 1/2 (or more generally another constant) from the observed number of successes. Although there is some advocacy of continuity corrections with respect to the binomial problem in the literature, it appears that there are better-performing ways to deal with the discreteness [2,36].…”
Section: Randomization Mid-p and Continuity Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another commonly used device in dealing with discrete distributions is called (somewhat optimistically) a continuity correction, for example adding or subtracting 1/2 (or more generally another constant) from the observed number of successes. Although there is some advocacy of continuity corrections with respect to the binomial problem in the literature, it appears that there are better-performing ways to deal with the discreteness [2,36].…”
Section: Randomization Mid-p and Continuity Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vollset [53] reviews in detail thirteen methods, recommending a continuitycorrected Wilson score method (strongly disfavored by Refs. [2,36]), but describing as "safe" the C-P intervals, mid-P intervals, and Wilson score intervals without the continuity correction. He finds likelihood-ratio intervals to be too narrow for boundary outcomes.…”
Section: Comparative Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%