2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2006.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment: Hf-isotope heterogeneity in zircon 91500

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

37
51
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 313 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
37
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Measured 176 Hf/ 177 Hf ratios were normalized to 179 Hf/ 177 Hf = 0.7325. Further external adjustment was not applied for the unknowns because our determined 176 Hf/ 177 Hf ratios for zircon standards 91500 (0.282309 ± 0.000004) and GJ-1 (0.282000 ± 0.000008) were in good agreement within errors with the reported values (Griffin et al, 2006;Wu et al, 2006). Zircon Hf isotopic data are listed in Table 3.…”
Section: Zircon Lu-hf Isotopessupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Measured 176 Hf/ 177 Hf ratios were normalized to 179 Hf/ 177 Hf = 0.7325. Further external adjustment was not applied for the unknowns because our determined 176 Hf/ 177 Hf ratios for zircon standards 91500 (0.282309 ± 0.000004) and GJ-1 (0.282000 ± 0.000008) were in good agreement within errors with the reported values (Griffin et al, 2006;Wu et al, 2006). Zircon Hf isotopic data are listed in Table 3.…”
Section: Zircon Lu-hf Isotopessupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Measured 176 Hf/ 177 Hf ratios were normalized to 179 Hf/ 177 Hf = 0.7325. Further external adjustment was not applied for the unknowns because our determined 176 Hf/ 177 Hf ratios for zircon standards 91500 (0.282308 ± 0.000004) and GJ-1 (0.282021 ± 0.000011) were in good agreement within errors with the reported values (Griffin et al, 2006;Wu et al, 2006;Zeh et al, 2007). Zircon Hf isotopic data are listed in Supplementary Table A.2.…”
Section: Zircon Lu-hf Isotopessupporting
confidence: 67%
“…No relationship between 176 Yb/ 177 Hf and 176 Hf/ 177 Hf ratios was observed in the studied samples, indicating that the correction of 176 Yb interference on 176 Hf is precise for obtaining accurate 176 Hf/ 177 Hf values. During analysis of the samples, the zircon standard 91500 applied for the instrumental mass fractionation gave 176 Hf/ 177 Hf = 0.282292 ± 14 (2 ), which is identical within error to the 176 Hf/ 177 Hf ratio of 0.282284 ± 22 reported by Griffin et al (2006). The uncertainties of calibrated isotope ratios include those from the sample, standards, and reference values, which are given at ±2 in Supplemental Table 3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 61%