2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on accuracy of predictive equations versus indirect calorimetry for the evaluation of energy expenditure in cancer patients with solid tumors - An integrative systematic review study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, the correct assessment of energy requirement becomes a crucial step in choosing the type and composition of the nutritional therapy. Several studies [ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ] emphasize the importance of indirect calorimetry as the goal standard in evaluating the real energy requirements in cancer patients. Predictive formulas, such as the Harris–Benedict equation, do not consider the cancer energy expenditure, underestimating the real REE of the patient [ 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the correct assessment of energy requirement becomes a crucial step in choosing the type and composition of the nutritional therapy. Several studies [ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ] emphasize the importance of indirect calorimetry as the goal standard in evaluating the real energy requirements in cancer patients. Predictive formulas, such as the Harris–Benedict equation, do not consider the cancer energy expenditure, underestimating the real REE of the patient [ 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%