2020
DOI: 10.5194/jbji-6-17-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on “Duration of rifampin therapy is a key determinant of improved outcomes in early-onset acute prosthetic joint infection due to Staphylococcus treated with a debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR): a retrospective multicenter study in France” by Becker et al. (2020)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, the study was underpowered to draw definitive conclusions, and in addition, rifampin was not combined with a fluoroquinolone or other agents active against biofilms, nor with antibiotics with adequate oral availability and bone penetration. The clear benefit of rifampin demonstrated in observational studies has been criticized because of confounding by indication and survival bias [ 8 , 14 , 15 ]. However, in our study, subanalyses in which confounding and bias were reduced to a minimum did not change the results, and consistently supported the use of rifampin in acute staphylococcal PJIs managed with DAIR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the study was underpowered to draw definitive conclusions, and in addition, rifampin was not combined with a fluoroquinolone or other agents active against biofilms, nor with antibiotics with adequate oral availability and bone penetration. The clear benefit of rifampin demonstrated in observational studies has been criticized because of confounding by indication and survival bias [ 8 , 14 , 15 ]. However, in our study, subanalyses in which confounding and bias were reduced to a minimum did not change the results, and consistently supported the use of rifampin in acute staphylococcal PJIs managed with DAIR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 3 studies, survival bias could be ruled out by excluding patients who failed early after debridement and before start of rifampicin [ 2 , 20 , 21 ], but survival bias was likely present in more studies. The positive association between duration of rifampicin and success rates after DAIR in the study of Becker et al [ 27 ] could be explained by survival bias and selectively excluding patients from the analysis who developed a failure while on rifampicin treatment [ 28 ]. Lora-Tamayo et al [ 2 ] described the strongest association between rifampicin use and outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment duration was 3 months in most studies included in this review. In some observational studies, shorter rifampicin treatment was associated with more treatment failure, but these results should be interpreted cautiously because studying treatment duration in observational studies is inherently affected by selection bias and survival bias [ 12 , 27 , 28 ]. More research is needed to gain more evidence regarding the timing and duration of rifampicin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment duration was 3 months in most studies included in this review. In some observational studies, shorter rifampicin treatment was associated with more treatment failure, but these results should be interpreted cautiously because studying treatment duration in observational studies is inherently affected by selection bias and survival bias [12,27,28]. More research is needed to gain more evidence regarding the timing and duration of rifampicin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%