2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12648-020-01742-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on “Energy levels, oscillator strengths, and transition probabilities for sulfur-like scandium, Sc VI” by El-Maaref et al.  [Indian J. Phys. 91 1029 (2017)]

Abstract: In this comment, through our independent calculations, we assess that the recently reported results of El-Maaref et al. [Indian J. Phys. 91 1029 (2017)] for energy levels, oscillator strengths, radiative rates, and lifetimes are inaccurate and unreliable for several levels and transitions of S-like Sc VI.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the present RMBPT values for both the transitions are in agreements with the NIST database ones to within 0.5%. The main reason for such large discrepancies of El-Maaref2016 [24] is maybe due to the inclusion of limited (and arbitrary) CI in their work, as explained by Aggarwal [53] for resolving similar issues caused by El-Maaref et al for sulfur-like scandium, where the deviations of the lifetimes from El-Maaref et al are up to three orders of magnitude. Fig.…”
Section: Radiative Ratesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In contrast, the present RMBPT values for both the transitions are in agreements with the NIST database ones to within 0.5%. The main reason for such large discrepancies of El-Maaref2016 [24] is maybe due to the inclusion of limited (and arbitrary) CI in their work, as explained by Aggarwal [53] for resolving similar issues caused by El-Maaref et al for sulfur-like scandium, where the deviations of the lifetimes from El-Maaref et al are up to three orders of magnitude. Fig.…”
Section: Radiative Ratesmentioning
confidence: 92%