2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.81.019801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on “Exact three-dimensional wave function and the on-shelltmatrix for the sharply cut-off Coulomb potential: Failure of the standard renormalization factor”

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge this formula has been derived here for the first time. The representation for the scattering amplitude obtained in the recent paper [16] was derived from the incorrect form of the wave function in the region r ≤ R [17] and cannot be considered as a contra result. The complete solution for the scattering problem for the potential V R is given in this paper for the first time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To the best of our knowledge this formula has been derived here for the first time. The representation for the scattering amplitude obtained in the recent paper [16] was derived from the incorrect form of the wave function in the region r ≤ R [17] and cannot be considered as a contra result. The complete solution for the scattering problem for the potential V R is given in this paper for the first time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the derivations made in [16] have been performed only for a particular value of the coordinate r = 0. It was not proven that the solution obtained in [16] is valid for all values of r. In the comment [17] it was shown by direct calculations that the three-dimensional result of [16] is erroneous. A further discussion of the results of [16] and their relation to the results of [12] can be found in [18].…”
Section: Definition Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation