2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.104.179601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on “Inaccuracy of Density Functional Theory Calculations for Dihydrogen Binding Energetics onto Ca Cation Centers”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 The mCD procedure [Eq. (8)] is carried out in the original GTO basis, and the resulting Cholesky vectors are then transformed to the orthogonalized basis.…”
Section: Implementation Of Cholesky Decomposition In Afqmcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 The mCD procedure [Eq. (8)] is carried out in the original GTO basis, and the resulting Cholesky vectors are then transformed to the orthogonalized basis.…”
Section: Implementation Of Cholesky Decomposition In Afqmcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inaccuracy in the calculation of hydrogen binding to Ca + centers for hydrogen storage has previously been reported by Cha et al28 The binding of hydrogen to Ca + is independent of the exchange‐correlation functional. The inadequate description of the 6‐311+G** basis set is lacking the proper polarization, which caused the inaccuracy, as reported in the work by Ohk et al29 By using a large enough basis with MP2 to produce the binding energies provides results that are similar to those with PBE approximation. In order to have reliable values for the binding energies, and to avoid the underestimation of GGA and overestimation of LDA, we used the van der Waals correction throughout this work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employed projector-augmented wave (PAW) potentials and Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) exchange-correlation functional [24], and selectively included the van der Waals (vdW) correction [25], as implemented in the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP) [26]. It has been known that the ad hoc combination of PBE and vdW correction works well for vdW systems, whereas PBE alone does for Kubas systems at certain accuracy [27][28][29]. The (8×8) graphene supercell with a 20-Å vacuum space, the (3×3×1) mesh for the k-points integration, and the energy cutoff of 400 eV were used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%