2013
DOI: 10.1002/pd.4202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on “QF‐PCR as a substitute for karyotyping of cytotrophoblast for the analysis of chorionic villi: advantages and limitations from a cytogenetic retrospective audit of 44 727 first‐trimester prenatal diagnoses”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most likely explanation is the difference in indications for sampling shown by a lower incidence of trisomies 13, 18 and 21 in the paper of Grati et al [ 25 ] (3% versus 7% (404/5967) in our patient group) ( Table 4 ). This is also confirmed by the paper of Toutain et al [ 26 , 27 ] who found an incidence of GMDD of 1/386 (0.26%) in a small series of CV sampled for increased nuchal translucency or other ultrasound abnormalities. So, depending on whether there is a high or low risk for aneuploidy, the estimated chance for a false negative NIPT diagnosis will vary between 0.02% and 0.26% ( Table 4 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The most likely explanation is the difference in indications for sampling shown by a lower incidence of trisomies 13, 18 and 21 in the paper of Grati et al [ 25 ] (3% versus 7% (404/5967) in our patient group) ( Table 4 ). This is also confirmed by the paper of Toutain et al [ 26 , 27 ] who found an incidence of GMDD of 1/386 (0.26%) in a small series of CV sampled for increased nuchal translucency or other ultrasound abnormalities. So, depending on whether there is a high or low risk for aneuploidy, the estimated chance for a false negative NIPT diagnosis will vary between 0.02% and 0.26% ( Table 4 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%