2016
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on Schielzeth et al. (2014): “Genome size variation affects song attractiveness in grasshoppers: Evidence for sexual selection against large genomes”

Abstract: Schielzeth et al. (2014) concluded that attractive grasshopper singers have significantly smaller genomes thus suggesting a possible role for sexual selection on genome size. Whereas this conclusion could still be conceivably valid, it is not supported by the data presented due to some technical flaws. In addition, the interpretation of the results, speculating on the possible presence of B chromosomes, is not justified.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). Camacho () commented on our publication expressing doubts whether the data support our conclusions. We appreciate his critical and thoughtful reading of our article and the interest in the topic that his comment reveals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…). Camacho () commented on our publication expressing doubts whether the data support our conclusions. We appreciate his critical and thoughtful reading of our article and the interest in the topic that his comment reveals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…biguttulus as 1C = 10.99 pg, which is in line with the measurements of Shah et al (9) (1C = 9.31 pg) and Husemann et al (8) (1C = 11.31 pg). This suggests that, as commented by Camacho (34), the measurement of Schielzeth et al (33) was indeed unreliable and does not represent a true value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…(1C = 11.31 pg). This suggests that, as commented by Camacho [34], the measurement of Schielzeth et al [33] was indeed unreliable and does not represent a true value. Within Acrididae, the largest genomes belong to representatives of the subfamilies Oedipodinae (maximum: Bryodemella tuberculata, 2n = 22+XX, 1C = 21.96 pg), Gomphocerinae (Chrysochraon dispar, 2n = 16+XX, 1C = 19.43 pg), and Melanoplinae (Podisma pedestris, 2n = 22+X0, 1C = 16.93 pg).…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 95%