2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.98.029801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on “Temperature dependence of nuclear fission time in heavy-ion fusion-fission reactions”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, this formula was derived in [8] for the quasistationary rate and should be applied for the average decay time with care (see e. g. [5,25]). Moreover, this formula is correct only when the well, where the flux runs to, is nearly empty.…”
Section: Equilibration Of the Coordinate Probability Density In Both ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, this formula was derived in [8] for the quasistationary rate and should be applied for the average decay time with care (see e. g. [5,25]). Moreover, this formula is correct only when the well, where the flux runs to, is nearly empty.…”
Section: Equilibration Of the Coordinate Probability Density In Both ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These equations are also applied for modeling electrical systems [4]. In our previous works [5][6][7], we concentrated on employing these equations for describing the thermally activated decay process of a metastable state (the so-called Kramers problem, see [8][9][10]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accuracy of the Kramers formulas for the decay rate derived in [11] was studied in several articles (see, e.g., [15][16][17]). Unfortunately, sometimes the Kramers formulas were misinterpreted (see, for example, [18][19][20] and detailed discussion of this problem in [21,22]). Usually, they consider the Kramers formulas obtained for the parabolic barrier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%