1974
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9601(74)90672-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on the high-frequency limit of the bremsstrahlung cross section

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high-frequency end point of a bremsstrahlung spectrum, usually called the spectrum 'tip', corresponds to interactions in which the kinetic energy of the incident electron is totally radiated. This part of the energy distribution has been of special theoretical interest since the beginning of the bremsstrahlung theory development [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], mainly motivated by the well-known limitations of the Bethe-Heitler formula [12] derived in the Born approximation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high-frequency end point of a bremsstrahlung spectrum, usually called the spectrum 'tip', corresponds to interactions in which the kinetic energy of the incident electron is totally radiated. This part of the energy distribution has been of special theoretical interest since the beginning of the bremsstrahlung theory development [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], mainly motivated by the well-known limitations of the Bethe-Heitler formula [12] derived in the Born approximation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relative method circumvents the need to know the thickness of the targets using instead theoretical elastic-scattering cross sections to place the DDCSs on an absolute scale. The experiment aimed at testing the validity of the Elwert-Haug formalism [6,7] for medium-Z elements. Aehlig et al [23] found that, on average, their measured data were somewhat higher than the theoretical Elwert-Haug DDCSs, but the discrepancy did not exceed 20%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%