2000
DOI: 10.1029/1999jb900324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on “The petrologic case for a dry lower crust” by Bruce W. D. Yardley and John W. Valley

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A clear example of this is the ongoing debate over the reason for the high conductivities observed in the lower crust. The available evidence has been taken to support both graphite or aqueous fluids as an explanation for the elevated conductivity (Yardley and Valley 1997;Wannamaker 2000). This is discussed in detail later in this chapter.…”
Section: Non-uniqueness In Interpreting Electrical Resistivity Measurmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A clear example of this is the ongoing debate over the reason for the high conductivities observed in the lower crust. The available evidence has been taken to support both graphite or aqueous fluids as an explanation for the elevated conductivity (Yardley and Valley 1997;Wannamaker 2000). This is discussed in detail later in this chapter.…”
Section: Non-uniqueness In Interpreting Electrical Resistivity Measurmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Some authors have proposed that interconnected graphite films may be responsible for this effect (Yardley and Valley, 1997) but this hypothesis has a number of weaknesses (Wannamaker, 2000). An alternative proposal is that aqueous saline fluids are responsible for the low resistivity of the lower crust (Wannamaker, 2000;Jones, 1992b). If the lower crust has a significant fluid content, then shearing could enhance the porosity and permeability, which would further lower the electrical resistivity.…”
Section: Imaging Resistivity Structure Of Shear Zones In the Mid And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whittington and others (1999) estimate that melting begins at 720°C and 8 kbars with 4 weight percent water in the melt. A water content of 4 weight percent for the melt means that a water activity of 0.6 to 0.7 and therefore a resistivity of 0.2 ohm-m can be expected (Wannamaker, 1986). There is sufficient water in the melt to lower its resistivity substantially.…”
Section: Magnetotelluric Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wannamaker (1986) shows that the resistivity of a silicic melt is dependent on its water content and can vary from 0.1 ohm-m for water-saturated melting to 1000 ohm-m for dry partial melting. Whittington and others (1999) estimate that melting begins at 720°C and 8 kbars with 4 weight percent water in the melt.…”
Section: Magnetotelluric Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%