2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.109.188901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on “Uncertainty Relation for Photons”

Abstract: In a recent interesting Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 140401 (2012)] I. Bialynicki-Birula and his coauthor have derived the uncertainty relation for the photons in three dimensions.However, some of their arguments are problematical, and this impacts their conclusion.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…gives the equations which are in some sense on an equal footing with the Dirac equation [2,3]. Likewise, one can apply the (1, 0) (0,1) ⊕ description to reformulating Maxwell equations as the so-called Dirac-like equation [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…gives the equations which are in some sense on an equal footing with the Dirac equation [2,3]. Likewise, one can apply the (1, 0) (0,1) ⊕ description to reformulating Maxwell equations as the so-called Dirac-like equation [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It predicts that, in the presence of an external magnetic field, the DW subjects to a rigid-body translational motion which is valid when the magnetic field is in a proper regime. Despite its attractive simplicity and elegance, and the fact that this Walker solution has played a pivotal role in our current understanding of both current-driven and field-driven DW propagation in magnetic nanowires [9][10][11][12][13], whether or not this solution is genuine, i.e., describing a realistic physical system, is still an open ques-tion. As one necessary touchstone, genuine solution of a physical system must be stable against small perturbations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 b) [15][16][17]. The first spin wave excitation peak at 7 cm −1 has not been assigned because it can either be attributed to the Φ + 0 mode or can result from small domains in the sample with weak magnetization [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%