2018
DOI: 10.18865/ed.28.s1.267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commentary: Can Critical Race Theory Enhance the Field of Public Health? A Student’s Perspective

Abstract: Critical race theory (CRT) is a body of work that seeks to understand and change the relationship between race, racism, and power. While relatively new to the health sciences, CRT is increasingly used as a conceptual framework to examine the role of racism in health inequalities. In this commentary, I outline ways in which CRT can also be used to enhance public health education, methodology, and practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Critical race theory (CRT) [ 13 ] informed the development of these “interpersonal” activities and includes an emphasis on institutional racism within US society and the intersection between race and power. By refuting tenets of colorblind ideology and integrating historical analyses, the CRT approach encourages behaviors that eliminate (not just document) racial equities [ 14 ]. We believe that the interpersonal awareness activities lead to more culturally aware mentoring behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical race theory (CRT) [ 13 ] informed the development of these “interpersonal” activities and includes an emphasis on institutional racism within US society and the intersection between race and power. By refuting tenets of colorblind ideology and integrating historical analyses, the CRT approach encourages behaviors that eliminate (not just document) racial equities [ 14 ]. We believe that the interpersonal awareness activities lead to more culturally aware mentoring behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article echoes the call from critical race theorists, social science, and public health scholars that meaningful interventions must address the racialized social structures that perpetuate racism, and not simply make gestures toward equity (Bonilla Silva, 1997; Cross, 2018; Ford & Airhihenbuwa, 2010). What is more, we argue that empirical engagement with social equity initiatives must examine the limits of these programs, which are often so narrowly targeted and limited in scope that they are unable to address the deeper social inequalities that structure their possibility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The conversations we had amongst ourselves or with leadership may not be as easy in other spaces where scholars of color may feel isolated and disparaged for discussing racism (Museus & Park, 2015). Finally, we recognize that this work would not be possible without the countless efforts of the students who advocated before us (Cross, 2018). Therefore, in honor of their labor, we share our reflections so that they may be of service to our graduate student colleagues on their academic journeys.…”
Section: Keeping It Real: the Labor Of Institutional Changementioning
confidence: 98%