“…In this issue, our colleague Dr David Taggart 1 is presenting a commentary on our recent publication, 2 concluding "Rather than the alarmist message of the investigators, implying an intrinsic biological/mechanistic problem with the RIMA graft, perhaps their real message is that 'a good vein graft is much better than a poorly harvested/deployed RIMA graft.'" I believe that he is pointing in the wrong direction.…”