2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commentary: Correction procedures in brain-age prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
185
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
8
185
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figures 4 , 5 show that although the DNN models exhibit the lowest correlation values ( R = 0.38 for cross-validation and R = 0.4 for the independent test), a systematic age underestimation in the age range 60−90 and overestimation in the age range 20−35 can be noted. This finding indicates that age bias correction techniques need to be further applied to achieve less biased models ( 52 , 53 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figures 4 , 5 show that although the DNN models exhibit the lowest correlation values ( R = 0.38 for cross-validation and R = 0.4 for the independent test), a systematic age underestimation in the age range 60−90 and overestimation in the age range 20−35 can be noted. This finding indicates that age bias correction techniques need to be further applied to achieve less biased models ( 52 , 53 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we tested the association between global brain aging and number of previous childbirths in the group of new participants, using a linear regression model with brain‐age delta as the dependent variable and number of childbirths as the independent variable. Chronological age was included as a covariate, adjusting for age‐bias in the brain‐age predictions as well as age‐dependence in number of childbirths (de Lange & Cole, 2020; Le et al, 2018). Note that the training set of 10,907 participants overlapping with the previous study showed a lower N relative to the original sample in (de Lange et al, 2019) due to variation in exclusion criteria (listed in Section 2.1; Sample charecteristics ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with recent brain-age studies [29,33,34,6,28], the XGBoost regressor model, which aging trajectories [18]. The delta estimates were corrected for chronological age using linear regression [36,37].…”
Section: Brain Age Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%