2018
DOI: 10.3389/fbuil.2018.00019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commentary: Fatigue Life Assessment Method for Prestressed Concrete Sleepers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, its scientific origin is somewhat questionable. In addition, it is important to note that high cycle fatigue failure of railway sleepers have never been observed in Japanese railway systems and such the absence is rather similar in other countries [23]. This has exposed the myth whether high-cycle fatigue would be of any concern when the concrete cross-sections in services are generally kept under compression due to prestress.…”
Section: Letter To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, its scientific origin is somewhat questionable. In addition, it is important to note that high cycle fatigue failure of railway sleepers have never been observed in Japanese railway systems and such the absence is rather similar in other countries [23]. This has exposed the myth whether high-cycle fatigue would be of any concern when the concrete cross-sections in services are generally kept under compression due to prestress.…”
Section: Letter To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to (Janeliukstis et al, 2019), a large part of the applied load is compensated by the inertia force distributed along the beam causing maximum bending moment at mid span and therefore, bending cracking of the beam. You et al, (2017), ( 2019) and Goto et al, (2018) explained that cracking of the concrete sleeper is generally considered to be the most appropriate failure criterion to define the state of load in the design process. Yang et al (2017) studied the load-deflection behavior for CC16 series sleepers and showed typical sleeper failure modes at the end of testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%