Commentary on “Assessment of Risk Factors of Intrauterine Adhesions in Patients with Induced Abortion and the Curative Effect of Hysteroscopic Surgery”

Sardo, Attilio Di Spiezio; Guardo, Federica Di; Santangelo, Fabrizia; Cianci, Stefano; Giampaolino, Pierluigi

doi:10.1080/08941939.2017.1400133

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This suggests that prior induced abortion did not influence ovulation or ovarian function. In accordance with many previous studies, the data indicated that the spontaneous abortion rate was higher and endometrial thickness was thinner among women with a history of induced abortion. Surgical abortion could make the endometrium thinner by damaging the lining, altering the secretion of inflammation factors, thereby interfering with the bonding between the uterus and embryo, leading to higher rates of spontaneous abortion.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Association between induced abortion history and later in vitro fertilization outcomes

Wang

Sun

et al. 2018

Intl J Gynecology & Obste

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Association between induced abortion history and later in vitro fertilization outcomes

Wang

Sun

et al. 2018

Intl J Gynecology & Obste

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Mo et al retrospectively analyzed factors influencing IUA and found age and BMI were not influencing factors, but female genital tract inflammation, an excessive number of pregnancies, history of intrauterine surgery [curettage, negative pressure suction, and cesarean section (22,23) were. Others have pointed out that more than two intrauterine operations, a curettage time of more than 15 minutes, and a history of myoma of uterus and polyps were also harmful factors (24,25). Chen et al further conducted an in-depth study on patients with secondary infertility and found that the number of abortions and surgical methods were not risk factors for secondary infertility after induced abortion, but IUA, endometritis, chronic salpingitis, ovarian dysfunction, and endometriosis were (26).…”

Section: Symptoms and Risk Factors Of Intrauterine Adhesionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of therapeutic efficacy of three methods to prevent re-adhesion after hysteroscopic intrauterine adhesion separation: a parallel, randomized and single-center trial

Zhang¹,

Liu²,

Zhou³

et al. 2021

Ann Palliat Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: This research aims to study the efficacy of an integrated approach to prevent and treat the recurrence of intrauterine adhesions (IUA) after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis.Methods: A total of 96 patients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe intrauterine adhesions (IUA) in Nantong Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2016 to December 2019 were included in this parallel, randomized and single-center trial. Moderate (48 cases) and severe (48 cases) patients were randomly divided into three groups by a computer random generator: Group A (IUD, n=16), Group B, (Foley1w+IUD, n=16) and Group C (Foley1m+IUD, n=16). All patients received sequential treatment of estrogen and progesterone on the day of operation. Follow-up was performed at 1 and 3 months after treatment of uterine cavity, endometrial thickness, menstruation and pregnancy. Surgeons who performed the second-look and third-look hysteroscopy and postsurgical assessors were blinded to the randomization.Results: In total, 96 patients (48 cases in each degree) were included in the final analysis, with 16 cases in each group. No cases were lost to follow up. The primary outcome measure was AFS score, which was significantly lower in Group C than that of women in group A and Group B at 1 month (P<0.05). Similar results were observed at 3-month follow up. In patients with moderate adhesions, the pregnancy rate in Group C (Foley1m+IUD) was higher than that in Group A and Group B (P<0.05). However, in patients with severe adhesions, there was no significant difference in the pregnancy rate among the three groups (P>0.05).There was no statistical significance in infection indicators among the three groups of moderate and severe patients (P>0.05). Postoperative complications such as uterine perforation, severe bleeding, water poisoning and intrauterine infection were not observed. Conclusions:The effect of a Foley intrauterine balloon combined with IUD in preventing re-adhesion was better than that of an IUD alone. For patients with moderate adhesion, the prolongation of placement time could prevent intrauterine re-adhesion and significantly improve the pregnancy rate with strong safety.However, for patients with severe adhesions, the prolongation of intrauterine Foley balloon placement did not better prevent intrauterine re-adhesions, improve menstruation, or improve pregnancy rates.

show abstract

The effect of previous induced abortion history on the assisted reproduction outcomes

Zhao

Zhang

et al. 2023

Arch Gynecol Obstet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Commentary on “Assessment of Risk Factors of Intrauterine Adhesions in Patients with Induced Abortion and the Curative Effect of Hysteroscopic Surgery”

Abstract: Intrauterine adhesions after induced abortion and hysteroscopic surgery 91A. D. S. Sardo et al.

Cited by 5 publications

References 26 publications

Association between induced abortion history and later in vitro fertilization outcomes

Association between induced abortion history and later in vitro fertilization outcomes

Comparison of therapeutic efficacy of three methods to prevent re-adhesion after hysteroscopic intrauterine adhesion separation: a parallel, randomized and single-center trial

The effect of previous induced abortion history on the assisted reproduction outcomes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About