2020
DOI: 10.1111/add.15190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commentary on Jin et al. (2020): Regulatory and allocative policies inform access to opioid agonist therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the ways in which concerns about AUB and overdose influence regulations, treatment access, and prescribing practices, research teasing out the nature of this relationship is critical. [19][20][21][22][23] Buprenorphine alone usually does not cause overdose, as it is a partial opioid agonist and is most commonly prescribed in a co-formulation with naloxone (an opioid antagonist); however, AUB could potentially be implicated in an overdose if mixed with other substances. Existing literature assessing this relationship is sparse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the ways in which concerns about AUB and overdose influence regulations, treatment access, and prescribing practices, research teasing out the nature of this relationship is critical. [19][20][21][22][23] Buprenorphine alone usually does not cause overdose, as it is a partial opioid agonist and is most commonly prescribed in a co-formulation with naloxone (an opioid antagonist); however, AUB could potentially be implicated in an overdose if mixed with other substances. Existing literature assessing this relationship is sparse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although both medications are federally regulated (e.g., buprenorphine prescribing panel limits), methadone regulations 5 limit the ability to create individualized treatment plans, to meet patient specific needs, and can impact employment opportunities or personal relationships. 6 Long-standing oppressive forces (e.g., racism and classism) [7][8][9] inform the system design differences between methadone and buprenorphine. The methadone system was established, in part, to address White political concerns related to crime and increased heroin use in New York City in the late 1960s, specifically targeting predominantly Black inner-city communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-standing oppressive forces (e.g., racism and classism) 7 9 inform the system design differences between methadone and buprenorphine. The methadone system was established, in part, to address White political concerns related to crime and increased heroin use in New York City in the late 1960s, specifically targeting predominantly Black inner-city communities 8 , 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%