2019
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commentary: Revisiting the Marshmallow Test: A Conceptual Replication Investigating Links Between Early Delay of Gratification and Later Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, instead of testing an individual in one standardized condition, we could measure an individual's cognitive performance in different natural (or artificial) conditions (e.g., social vs. nonsocial, temperature gradient, etc.) to take into account plastic responses at the individual and population levels (Voelkl and Würbel, 2016;Barragan-Jason et al, 2018a;Caza and Atance, 2018). Such an approach would not only enable a more accurate measure of cognitive abilities, teasing out repeatable and plastic components (Dingemanse et al, 2010), but could also help us better understand the adaptive value of plastic cognitive responses.…”
Section: Why Consider Context In Cognitive Sciences?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, instead of testing an individual in one standardized condition, we could measure an individual's cognitive performance in different natural (or artificial) conditions (e.g., social vs. nonsocial, temperature gradient, etc.) to take into account plastic responses at the individual and population levels (Voelkl and Würbel, 2016;Barragan-Jason et al, 2018a;Caza and Atance, 2018). Such an approach would not only enable a more accurate measure of cognitive abilities, teasing out repeatable and plastic components (Dingemanse et al, 2010), but could also help us better understand the adaptive value of plastic cognitive responses.…”
Section: Why Consider Context In Cognitive Sciences?mentioning
confidence: 99%