2018
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commentary: Why Don't You Go to Bed on Time? A Daily Diary Study on the Relationships Between Chronotype, Self-Control Resources and the Phenomenon of Bedtime Procrastination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, these findings cast doubt on the claim made by Kroese et al. (2018), namely that “framing the issue of bedtime procrastination as a self-regulation problem is […] theoretically sound and practically fruitful” (Kroese et al., 2018, p. 915). Our results, by contrast, would seem to be more in line with the view of Kühnel et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Overall, these findings cast doubt on the claim made by Kroese et al. (2018), namely that “framing the issue of bedtime procrastination as a self-regulation problem is […] theoretically sound and practically fruitful” (Kroese et al., 2018, p. 915). Our results, by contrast, would seem to be more in line with the view of Kühnel et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In the present study, we looked at the issue of Bedtime Procrastination from a psychological point of view. However, as suggested by Kroese et al [55], we recognize that the phenomenon of Bedtime Procrastination is complex, and can be researched from different perspectives (e.g., biological). Therefore, future research could consider studying the role of distinct types of variables or aspects that may be unique to Bedtime Procrastination, such as the bedroom environment, household sleep and meal routines, tiredness, and circadian preferences (i.e., morningness/eveningness).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to the taxonomy of Michie et al [55] that identified a 16-cluster solution, our intervention components can be classified into the clusters "goals and planning" and "feedback and monitoring." Over and above the effects of behavior change techniques, further studies should consider moderators, mediators, and secondary outcomes that have been recently linked to selfregulation and sleep outcomes and might be important for teachers as well, i.e., sleep hygiene behavior, chronotype, the tendency to engage in bedtime procrastination, detachment from work, perseverative cognitions, and burnout [56][57][58][59]. Moreover, it might be even more effective to tailor the intervention (and assessment of intentions) towards individual sleep need instead of using a generalized goal of sleeping 8 h. Such an approach would take existing interindividual differences in sleep need into account [60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%