2010
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2009.090668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comments on "analysis of cognitive radio spectrum access with optimal channel reservation"

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [13], [14] and [15], the case when a PU channel could be split into several SU channels are modeled through CTMCs. The authors of [13] and [14] mainly focus on the cases when there are infinite number of users, and both spectrum handover and non-handover cases are considered.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13], [14] and [15], the case when a PU channel could be split into several SU channels are modeled through CTMCs. The authors of [13] and [14] mainly focus on the cases when there are infinite number of users, and both spectrum handover and non-handover cases are considered.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, handoff mechanisms fail when all the idle channels are occupied by PUs and SUs. Mathematically, it is represented by, j i N   (18) where N, i, j denote total number of channels, PU and SUtier1 in CRN respectively.…”
Section: Design Of Markov Model For 2-tier Crn With Spectrum Handoff mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expression for P D is derived from [18] and is expressed in (41) as per the designed Markov Model.…”
Section: {10}mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first phase is MAC protocol design itself, which aims at proposing feasible schemes to make CRNs access spectrum more efficiently [2][3][4]. The second phase is to build analytical models in order to help us better understand the dynamics behind these schemes and evaluate the performance of different strategies [5][6][7][8][9]. In this study, we mainly focus on the second phase and analyze the performance of channel aggregation represented by two new strategies, i.e., the Greedy strategy and the Dynamic strategy, when spectrum adaptation is enabled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work is motivated by the observation that the performance of SU networks with various channel aggregation strategies is not thoroughly analyzed through mathematical models. For example, in [5][6][7], the performance of an SU network when a channel for Primary Users (PUs) can be divided into several channels for SUs is analyzed based on a Continuous Time Markov Chain (CTMC) model. In [8,9], the performance of several channel aggregation strategies when spectrum adaptation is not enabled is studied through CTMC models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%