2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comments on “Decontamination of solutions containing Cu(II) and ligands tartrate, glycine and quardol using metallic iron” [J. Hazard. Mater. (175 (2010) 452–459)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The kinetics of Cu II -EDTA removal by Fe 0 /WMF was apparently retarded by decreasing the Cu II /EDTA molar ratio, with over 96% Cu II removal When Cu II ions are present as Cu II -EDTA, the reductive removal of Cu II -EDTA can be described by Eq. (6)[25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinetics of Cu II -EDTA removal by Fe 0 /WMF was apparently retarded by decreasing the Cu II /EDTA molar ratio, with over 96% Cu II removal When Cu II ions are present as Cu II -EDTA, the reductive removal of Cu II -EDTA can be described by Eq. (6)[25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bimetal Preparation Procedure. The preparation process was similar to our previous study (eq 1), 9,18 but the complexants (e.g., EDTA-2Na) were added into the CuSO 4 plating solution (eq 2), 19 and the obtained mFe/ Cu bimetal was labeled as "mFe/nCu", in which "m" represented the micrograde and "n" indicated the nanograde. In addition, the optimization of preparation parameters (e.g., TML Cu , molar ratios of Cu/EDTA (for convenience, EDTA-2Na was written as EDTA in this paper), types of complexing agent, temperature, stirring speed, and volume of plating solution) was performed thoroughly in this study.…”
Section: Mfe/ncumentioning
confidence: 99%