2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.115118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comments on defining entanglement entropy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will find that two of these definitions -the extended Hilbert space definition and the so-called "algebraic" definition -differ by a term proportional to L, hence yielding the same answer for the term S topo . This calculation corrects a comment made by [24] and repeated elsewhere [17,27], in the context of lattice gauge theories, stating that only one of these two definitions correctly reproduces the topological entanglement entropy. 12 (The quantum double model coincides with the weakly coupled limit of a lattice gauge theory.…”
Section: S(ρsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…We will find that two of these definitions -the extended Hilbert space definition and the so-called "algebraic" definition -differ by a term proportional to L, hence yielding the same answer for the term S topo . This calculation corrects a comment made by [24] and repeated elsewhere [17,27], in the context of lattice gauge theories, stating that only one of these two definitions correctly reproduces the topological entanglement entropy. 12 (The quantum double model coincides with the weakly coupled limit of a lattice gauge theory.…”
Section: S(ρsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…There have also been efforts to characterize, for local subsystems, the most general boundary symmetry algebras spanned by the edge modes [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], with potentially important consequences for quantum gravity [22,23]. Another important development at finite distance has been the realization that a proper treatment of the edge modes is crucial even when dealing with fictitious entangling interfaces, which has consequences in the computations of entanglement entropy [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. At infinity on the other hand, a lot of work has been dedicated towards understanding the intricate infrared properties of theories with massless excitations, and there a central role is played by large gauge transformations and soft modes [35].…”
Section: Jhep09(2020)134mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On a spatial hypersurface, the physical phase space and Hilbert space of a gauge theory both fail to be factorizable due to the presence of the gauge constraints 2 and the resulting inherent non-locality of gauge-invariant observables. Aside from being a conceptual issue for the JHEP09(2020)134 definition of local subsystems [15], this also represents an a priori technical obstruction to computing quantities such as the entanglement entropy of gauge fields across a fictitious interface between two regions [33]. This difficulty can however be bypassed by resorting to a so-called extended Hilbert space.…”
Section: Jhep09(2020)134mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations