2022
DOI: 10.1002/aic.17686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comments on “Monte Carlo simulations for water adsorption in porous materials: Best practices and new insights”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The entire isotherm for TIP4P in ZIF-8 is, however, at lower relative pressure compared to the isotherm for SPC/E water; the LOS are at p / p 0 ≈ 35 and p / p 0 ≈ 5600. This important difference is due primarily to the longer-range pair interaction between TIP4P molecules and the MOF and secondarily due to differences in phase behavior of the two water models (i.e., TIP4P water has a higher saturation pressure than SPC/E water). The longer-range potential (both LJ and electrostatic terms) strengthens the interaction with the MOF and consequently shifts the hysteresis loop to lower pressure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The entire isotherm for TIP4P in ZIF-8 is, however, at lower relative pressure compared to the isotherm for SPC/E water; the LOS are at p / p 0 ≈ 35 and p / p 0 ≈ 5600. This important difference is due primarily to the longer-range pair interaction between TIP4P molecules and the MOF and secondarily due to differences in phase behavior of the two water models (i.e., TIP4P water has a higher saturation pressure than SPC/E water). The longer-range potential (both LJ and electrostatic terms) strengthens the interaction with the MOF and consequently shifts the hysteresis loop to lower pressure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also ran FHMC simulations of bulk SPC/E water at 300 K, using the same cutoff and Ewald strategies as for the adsorption simulations, and the resultant ln Π( N ;μ) is used to convert μ to bulk-fluid pressure and identify the bulk-fluid saturation pressure ( p 0 ). For SPC/E water at 300 K as simulated here, p 0 = 1313 ± 6 Pa; we note that this is about 30% larger than the saturation pressure of SPC/E water at 300 K using long-range corrections. , Finally, for reasons that are explained in Section , we will present some simulation results in terms of the fugacity ( f ) of the SPC/E adsorbate. Here, we use the conventional definition of the fugacity: f = k B T exp false( β μ false) Λ 3 where Λ is the thermal de Broglie wavelength.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the study of liquid–vapor phase equilibrium, the pressure, density and free energy of the vapor and liquid phases may be calculated directly . In addition to equilibrium states, metastable states and the critical point as well as other thermodynamic or structural properties of interest at a given temperature can also be obtained with these approaches. TMMC has also been successfully applied toward the study of adsorption on surfaces and inside porous materials. TMMC may also be used in studies of self-assembly to calculate critical micelle concentrations, critical micelle temperatures and other structural transitions. , Temperature extrapolation methods further improve the efficiency of TMMC by reducing the number of required simulations, and initialization with Wang–Landau can reduce convergence times. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study of water adsorption utilized single-macrostate TMMC simulations and reported large efficiency gains compared to conventional GCE Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. ,, However, no efficiency comparison was made to multiple-macrostate TMMC simulations in the GCE. To our knowledge, such a comparison remains lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation