2022
DOI: 10.1002/aoc.6929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comments on multiple publications reporting single heating rate kinetics

Abstract: This note alerts one to multiple Applied Organometallic Chemistry publications that report the single heating rate kinetics for thermal decomposition of organometallic compounds. It is stressed that the single heating rate approach is known to produce erroneous kinetic parameters. Its use is also against the recommendations of the International Confederation for Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry that advises the multiple heating rate approach to be used instead. Examples of the failure are provided and an appea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This example reinforces the recommendation of the International Confederation for Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry (ICTAC) that single heating rate methods should be avoided in favor of methods that use multiple heating rates simultaneously [5]. Ignoring this simple recommendation leads to estimating invalid kinetic triplets, which, when used in simulations, produce entirely meaningless results [57,58].…”
Section: Avrami-arrhenius Treatment For Limited Temperature Rangesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…This example reinforces the recommendation of the International Confederation for Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry (ICTAC) that single heating rate methods should be avoided in favor of methods that use multiple heating rates simultaneously [5]. Ignoring this simple recommendation leads to estimating invalid kinetic triplets, which, when used in simulations, produce entirely meaningless results [57,58].…”
Section: Avrami-arrhenius Treatment For Limited Temperature Rangesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…This fact, as well as the necessity to adapt the use of experimental methods to a significant degree can, however, lead to drawing extremely far-reaching conclusions without due experimental justification. This issue has already been noted in literature, as seen in the case of the criticism of kinetics studies that utilise a single heating rate in thermal analysis [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…While the reliability of thermochemical data in a given work may raise no concerns by itself, a comparison of multiple works on the same material can reveal significant discrepancies between the reported results. Methodological issues and insufficiently precise descriptions of experimental procedures are two more identified points of concern regarding the reliability of reported thermochemical data [10,11], with the former compromising the validity of reported thermochemical data and the latter precluding verification of data through the repetition of the reported experiments. These issues are further exacerbated by the lack of experiment repetition or the lack of statistical work-up if the experiments have been repeated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%