2018
DOI: 10.3390/rs10101625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comments on “Wind Gust Detection and Impact Prediction for Wind Turbines”

Abstract: We refute statements in “Zhou, K., et al. Wind gust detection and impact prediction for wind turbines. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 514.” the impracticality of motion estimation methods to derive two-component vector wind fields from single scanning aerosol lidar data. Our assertion is supported by recently published results on the performance of two image-based motion estimation methods: cross-correlation (CC) and wavelet-based optical flow (WOF). The characteristics and performances of CC and WOF are compared with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mayor and Dérian [26] refuted statements in Zhou [25] that argued on impracticality of motion estimation methods to derive two-component vector wind fields from single scanning aerosol lidar data. Two image-based motion estimation methods, namely the cross-correlation and wavelet-based optical flow methods, were demonstrated to be also practical to use for wind gust detection and impact prediction on wind turbines.…”
Section: Overview Of Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Mayor and Dérian [26] refuted statements in Zhou [25] that argued on impracticality of motion estimation methods to derive two-component vector wind fields from single scanning aerosol lidar data. Two image-based motion estimation methods, namely the cross-correlation and wavelet-based optical flow methods, were demonstrated to be also practical to use for wind gust detection and impact prediction on wind turbines.…”
Section: Overview Of Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 98%