2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1389-0344(03)00076-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commercial development of microalgal biotechnology: from the test tube to the marketplace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
200
0
25

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 466 publications
(225 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
200
0
25
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 60s, Oswald and Golueke (1960) demonstrated the feasibility of mitigating gas 422 effluents resulting from a power plant with a high-rate pond. Furthermore, the addition of CO 2 423 in algal ponds enhances algal growth (Olaizola, 2003;Doucha et al, 2005) provided that pH 424 is regulated. It also maintains a low pH that decreases the gaseous ammonia emission 425 (Heubeck et al, 2007).…”
Section: Codigestion 386mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 60s, Oswald and Golueke (1960) demonstrated the feasibility of mitigating gas 422 effluents resulting from a power plant with a high-rate pond. Furthermore, the addition of CO 2 423 in algal ponds enhances algal growth (Olaizola, 2003;Doucha et al, 2005) provided that pH 424 is regulated. It also maintains a low pH that decreases the gaseous ammonia emission 425 (Heubeck et al, 2007).…”
Section: Codigestion 386mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to aspects 2 and 3 increase of the diameter is possible only in narrow limits, usually not more than 40 mm. Tubes with much bigger diameter (440 cm) have been occasionally tried out [50] but showed only low biomass concentrations and low areal and volumetric productivities, probably because the diameter is much larger than the light path length. A recently development has been taken from the market.…”
Section: Commonly Employed Reactor Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Selection of cost-effective technologies for biomass harvesting and drying Given the relatively low biomass concentration obtainable in microalgal cultivation systems due to the limit of light penetration (typically in the range of 1-5 g/L) and the small size of microalgal cells (typically in the range of 2-20 lm in diameter), costs and energy consumption for biomass harvesting are a significant concern needs to be addressed properly. Different technologies, including chemical flocculation, 75 biological flocculation, 76 filtration, 77 centrifugation, 78 and ultrasonic aggregation 79 have been investigated for microalgal biomass harvesting. In general, chemical and biological flocculation require only low operating costs; however, they have the disadvantage of requiring long processing period and having the risk of bioreactive product decomposition.…”
Section: Design Of Advanced Photobioreactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%