“…The final decision is often made on a higher hierarchical level, depending on the amount and riskiness, from the local bank office committee to the banks headquarters. This is in contrast to recent developments in the UK, where banks have used credit scoring systems and centralized decision making to help overcome difficulties in assessing risk in small firm loan applicants (Deakins et al, 2004) Concerning the characteristics of the firm affecting the likelihood of receiving funding, an extensive literature review shows that information pertaining to the characteristics of the borrower typically deals with the general risk proclivity of the SME (Sargent et al, 1991;Scherr et al, 1993;Sinkey, 1992), the competence within the business project (Berggren, Lindström & Olofsson, 2001;Harhof & Körting, 1998;Hedeling & Sjöberg, 1993Petersen & Rajan, 1994); the CEO's personal experience (Beaulieu, 1994(Beaulieu, & 1996Cooper et al, 1989Cooper et al, & 1995Davidson & Honig, 2003;Hedelin, 1999;Jankowicz & Hisrich, 1987;Keasey & Watson, 1991;Pettit & Singer, 1985); the extent of strategic planning (Beaulieu, 1994(Beaulieu, & 1996Sinkey, 1992;Berger, 1997Berger, /1998Mintzberg & Waters, 1985;Matthews & Scott, 1995); and the past performance of the firm (Gibson 1993;Kam 1990;Altman 1983); Beaulieu, 1996;Berger & Udell, 1995;Deakins & Hussain, 1994;Tiermey & Truglio, 1997;Uzzi, 1999). For a review of previous research that discusses the use of these factors, the reader is referred to Table 1 in the appendix.…”