2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-024-2046-3_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commercial-UAV-Based Structure from Motion for Geological and Geohazard Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commensurately, the rapid uptake of low-cost, readily deployable multi-senor drones has extended the reach of such techniques, enabling nadir view photogrammetric surveys of horizontal outcrops, as well as occlusion free reconstructions of large vertical sections [8][9][10]. Despite the relative simplicity with which 3D surface reconstructions of geological exposures (i.e., virtual or digital outcrop models: [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]) can be acquired using such platforms, the reliability of the geospatial information extracted from their data products is typically unclear, particularly when survey grade measurements are unavailable to calibrate and benchmark the resultant outcrop models. The deployed sensor platform's accuracy and precision in terms of position and orientation is often a key consideration for many geoscientific applications of 3D surface reconstructions, with deviations in the resultant scale, geolocation and attitude of the generated models being deleterious to the quality of metric data extracted thereof.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commensurately, the rapid uptake of low-cost, readily deployable multi-senor drones has extended the reach of such techniques, enabling nadir view photogrammetric surveys of horizontal outcrops, as well as occlusion free reconstructions of large vertical sections [8][9][10]. Despite the relative simplicity with which 3D surface reconstructions of geological exposures (i.e., virtual or digital outcrop models: [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]) can be acquired using such platforms, the reliability of the geospatial information extracted from their data products is typically unclear, particularly when survey grade measurements are unavailable to calibrate and benchmark the resultant outcrop models. The deployed sensor platform's accuracy and precision in terms of position and orientation is often a key consideration for many geoscientific applications of 3D surface reconstructions, with deviations in the resultant scale, geolocation and attitude of the generated models being deleterious to the quality of metric data extracted thereof.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been gaining diverse applications in the most varied disciplines, including landslide studies [17], for being low-cost (regarding both hardware and software), being easy to learn and use, and providing point density and accuracy comparable to that obtained via lidar (light detection and ranging). When paired with remotely piloted aircrafts (RPAs), it can be even more efficient [18,19], as RPA-based SfM-MSV has proven to be extremely powerful for hazard mapping and landslide-related data collection [17,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. For these reasons, RPA SfM-MVS is an excellent option for those applications that benefit from frequently revised terrain models for landslide risk monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%