1999
DOI: 10.1126/science.286.5448.2277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commercialization of Genetic Research and Public Policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5) Communication of results needs to be clear upfront. 6) Commercialisation issues also need to be addressed [73]. Moreover, while people generally cannot own their DNA, they do exercise control, and the institution, custodianship.…”
Section: Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5) Communication of results needs to be clear upfront. 6) Commercialisation issues also need to be addressed [73]. Moreover, while people generally cannot own their DNA, they do exercise control, and the institution, custodianship.…”
Section: Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These may include a human rights approach (working through codes, conventions, and international courts, with the participation of public interest groups); a statutory approach (in which legislation is crafted to respond to new technologies and which may represent a public consensus, though one limited to the “public” to which the laws apply); an administrative approach (in which governmental or professional bodies set codes and accredit practitioners, sometimes evading more restrictive legislation); and a market‐driven approach (in which consumer choice both stimulates investment and threatens litigation). These authors observe that “the increasingly multicentered and international nature of human genetic research and pharmacogenomics suggests that the time is ripe for international harmonization.” 12 Yet there is no international or regulatory body than can mandate such a development.…”
Section: The Priority Of Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Otherwise, the technically more demanding but logical next step towards freemarket eugenics might be to apply the new genetic criteria for prenatal choice to preimplantation diagnosis. 25 Unlike prenatal diagnosis, pre-implantation diagnosis does not involve abortion which, as a traumatic intervention, provides a psychological barrier to parental choice relating to minor undesired traits.…”
Section: Are We Prepared?mentioning
confidence: 99%