1998
DOI: 10.1109/60.678983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commissioning experience with a modern digital excitation system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the synchronous generator, although it may be represented by a seventh order nonlinear model , , it is a common practice in AVR design for the SG to be approximated by the transient model especially derived for the control design , the first order transfer function GG()s=Ug()sUf()s=KG1sτG+1 where τ G and K G represent the equivalent SG transient time constant and static gain derived from the particular generator operating point (determined by the operating SG excitation current, stator voltage, active and reactive power ), U f SG excitation voltage, and U g stator voltage RMS value. Since τ G is commonly several orders higher than τ TB (for the 300 MW aggregate presented in this paper τ G = 7 s and τ TB = 1.1 ms) the thyristor bridge time delay may be neglected, which means that its model may be approximated by the static gain K TB .…”
Section: Power Converter and Synchronous Generator Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding the synchronous generator, although it may be represented by a seventh order nonlinear model , , it is a common practice in AVR design for the SG to be approximated by the transient model especially derived for the control design , the first order transfer function GG()s=Ug()sUf()s=KG1sτG+1 where τ G and K G represent the equivalent SG transient time constant and static gain derived from the particular generator operating point (determined by the operating SG excitation current, stator voltage, active and reactive power ), U f SG excitation voltage, and U g stator voltage RMS value. Since τ G is commonly several orders higher than τ TB (for the 300 MW aggregate presented in this paper τ G = 7 s and τ TB = 1.1 ms) the thyristor bridge time delay may be neglected, which means that its model may be approximated by the static gain K TB .…”
Section: Power Converter and Synchronous Generator Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the synchronous generator, although it may be represented by a seventh order nonlinear model [7], [29], it is a common practice in AVR design [5][6][7][8][9] for the SG to be approximated by the transient model especially derived for the control design [7], the first order transfer function…”
Section: Power Converter and Synchronous Generator Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The block diagram for this system is shown in Fig. 3, and the exciter model is given by [27][28][29] …”
Section: Exciter Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But there are still many uncertain parameters of the transfer function. In order to satisfy the qualification, pulse-response of the digital voltage regulator for DSEG is used to get the input and output data by AD block at the condition of open-loop [4][5]. Method of superposition fitting is adopted to identify those uncertain parameters and errors of the identification are compared to the actual values to confirm the veracity of the fitting function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%