2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2016.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commitment in the household: Evidence from the effect of inheritances on the labor supply of older married couples

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Column (4) interacts with the postinheritance dummy with individual and spousal expectations and suggests no discernible role for spousal expectations in the labour supply of women following an inheritance. This is in line with previous findings that households do not behave in line with a collective model upon receiving a wealth shock (Cesarini et al, 2017;Blau and Goodstein, 2016). Turning to men, the left-hand panel of Figure 1 indicates that men's hours of work are unchanged after the receipt of an inheritance, whether the inheritance was expected or unexpected.…”
Section: Effect Of Expected and Unexpected Inheritances On Hours Workedsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Column (4) interacts with the postinheritance dummy with individual and spousal expectations and suggests no discernible role for spousal expectations in the labour supply of women following an inheritance. This is in line with previous findings that households do not behave in line with a collective model upon receiving a wealth shock (Cesarini et al, 2017;Blau and Goodstein, 2016). Turning to men, the left-hand panel of Figure 1 indicates that men's hours of work are unchanged after the receipt of an inheritance, whether the inheritance was expected or unexpected.…”
Section: Effect Of Expected and Unexpected Inheritances On Hours Workedsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Bo et al (2016) study the effect of inheritances on labour supply in Norway, finding differential effects by age, marital and family status of recipients. The effect of inheritances on the labour supply of both spouses, controlling for inheritance expectation, has recently been studied for older couples in the US in a contribution by Blau and Goodstein (2016) who find that inheritances reduce the labour supply of the heir with little impact on the labour supply of their spouse. Brown et al (2010) isolates the effects of both unexpected and expected inheritances on retirement probabilities in the US, finding that unexpected inheritances induce retirement more often than expected inheritances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The papers closest to ours are Brown et al (2010) and Blau and Goodstein (2016). Using data from the Health and Retirement Survey (HRS), both papers show that individuals who inherit between two waves of the survey are also more likely to exit the labor market during that time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Neither paper distinguishes between NIC and LIC. Other examples are Voena (2015) and Blau and Goodstein (2016).…”
Section: Testing For Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%