2020
DOI: 10.1080/15309576.2020.1812410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Committed to Reciprocate on a Bribe or Blow the Whistle: The Effects of Periodical Staff-Rotation in Public Administration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specific personnel management measures are also considered potential corruption prevention tools. For example, under the job rotation, public officials are less likely to accept bribes and this leads to less manipulated decision-making by public officials (Fišar et al, 2021). Also well-curated content for employee training may mitigate the corruption problem.…”
Section: Addressing Corruption Through the Hrm Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific personnel management measures are also considered potential corruption prevention tools. For example, under the job rotation, public officials are less likely to accept bribes and this leads to less manipulated decision-making by public officials (Fišar et al, 2021). Also well-curated content for employee training may mitigate the corruption problem.…”
Section: Addressing Corruption Through the Hrm Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gilpatric et al (2015) use a similar approach and arrive at equivalent results in the context of regulatory compliance. Fišar et al (2019) test a relative rule for income‐tax enforcement with exogenous income in the laboratory. The most closely related settings are the the rank‐order tournament auditing in Cason et al (2016) and the relative rule for environmental enforcement in Goeschl et al (2021).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of confining employees to a single job profile, job rotation (JR) involves the systematic movement of employees between different roles and functions within an organization, encouraging them to take on varied responsibilities, allowing for the development of a broad skillset [7][8][9][10][11]. Implementing a JR approach in workforce scheduling addresses these challenges by providing a dynamic framework that adapts to changing demands while allowing for real-time adjustments in workforce allocation based on demand fluctuations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%