2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-8741(02)00189-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commodification of the sacred through intellectual property rights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Geographer Daniel Robinson regards biopiracy as "the appropriation of biological resources and associated knowledge, particularly from the most biodiverse developing countries and from farmers, indigenous peoples and local communities" [46]. Key accounts of biopiracy include Vandana Shiva's Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge (1997) [47] and Darrell Posey's work in ethnobiology [48], both of which argue for ethical standards governing the commodification of traditional knowledge, including of medicinal plants. However, while critics of biopiracy advocate stronger rights for indigenous groups and the protection of the intellectual property related to their traditional ecological knowledge, an ethics of reciprocity with non-human species has not figured into their analyses.…”
Section: Cancer Camas and Croton: Traditional Ecological Knowledge mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geographer Daniel Robinson regards biopiracy as "the appropriation of biological resources and associated knowledge, particularly from the most biodiverse developing countries and from farmers, indigenous peoples and local communities" [46]. Key accounts of biopiracy include Vandana Shiva's Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge (1997) [47] and Darrell Posey's work in ethnobiology [48], both of which argue for ethical standards governing the commodification of traditional knowledge, including of medicinal plants. However, while critics of biopiracy advocate stronger rights for indigenous groups and the protection of the intellectual property related to their traditional ecological knowledge, an ethics of reciprocity with non-human species has not figured into their analyses.…”
Section: Cancer Camas and Croton: Traditional Ecological Knowledge mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intellectual property (IP) law to date has not effectively considered the rights of Indigenous peoples as holders of Indigenous knowledge or as victims of exploitation (Mead, 1996;Posey, 2002). Consequently, any attempts to reconcile Indigenous knowledge with conventional intellectual property rights (IPR) must take cognisance of "the growing value of Indigenous knowledge in different areas of scientific, cultural, economic, and commercial endeavour" (Oguamanam, 2004, p. 139).…”
Section: The Legal and Ethical Dimensions Of Cultural And Intellectuamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the public domain concept is problematic from the perspective of many traditional societies in which TK holders or others, such as tribal elders, have permanent responsibilities concerning the use of such knowledge, irrespective of whether it is secret, is known to just a few people, or is known to thousands of people throughout the world. 19 Custodianship responsibilities do not necessarily cease to exist just because the knowledge has been placed in the so-called public domain.…”
Section: (Iii) Not Everything In the Public Domain Should Be In The Pmentioning
confidence: 99%