2017
DOI: 10.30630/joiv.1.4-2.65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common Benchmark Functions for Metaheuristic Evaluation: A Review

Abstract: Abstract-In literature, benchmark test functions have been used for evaluating performance of metaheuristic algorithms. Algorithms that perform well on a set of numerical optimization problems are considered as effective methods for solving real-world problems. Different researchers choose different set of functions with varying configurations, as there exists no standard or universally agreed test-bed. This makes hard for researchers to select functions that can truly gauge the robustness of a metaheuristic a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We benchmarked the described hybrid algorithms on multidimensional test functions for optimization, such as the Sphere [32] function f 1 , the Styblinsky-Tang function [33] f 2 , the Rosenbrock [34] function f 3 and the Rastrigin [35] function f 4 . We performed the tests using 3, 5 and 10 dimensions.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We benchmarked the described hybrid algorithms on multidimensional test functions for optimization, such as the Sphere [32] function f 1 , the Styblinsky-Tang function [33] f 2 , the Rosenbrock [34] function f 3 and the Rastrigin [35] function f 4 . We performed the tests using 3, 5 and 10 dimensions.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed the tests using 3, 5 and 10 dimensions. Additionally, we considered such two-dimensional test functions, as Ackley [32], Matyas [36], Eggholder [37] and Booth [36] functions, defined in Table 1 as f 5 , f 6 , f 7 and f 8 , respectively. The Michalewicz [32] function f 9 was tested with 2, 5 and 10 dimensions.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For all the algorithms, the maximum number of iterations was 1500. The experimental settings including test functions, number of dimensions, and the number of experimental runs are taken from the commonly used settings suggested in [21].…”
Section: A Experimental Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%