2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common cause failure analysis of PWR containment spray system by GO-FLOW methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) Alternations and updates to a GO-FLOW chart are readily accomplished. (3) GO-FLOW contains all the possible system operational states.…”
Section: Go-flow Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) Alternations and updates to a GO-FLOW chart are readily accomplished. (3) GO-FLOW contains all the possible system operational states.…”
Section: Go-flow Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modeling technique produces a chart which consists of signal lines and operators, and represents engineering function of the components/subsystems/system. Moreover, it is able to model and analyze complex systems which contain multi-state under different functional scenario [2]. Now, some software and approaches are able to support the calculation of GO-FLOW methodology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muhammad et al [22] performed reliability evaluation with GO-FLOW method to determinate the influence of automatic depressurization system in dynamic reliability of passive core cooling system of AP1000. Common cause failure issues in the reliability analysis and the procedure of analysis has been treated by GO-FLOW method [23,24]. The GO-FLOW method is a success-oriented system analysis technique and capable of evaluating system reliability and risk [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the formulas, the probability of each operator can be directly calculated and it is unnecessary to calculate the joint probabilities. Representative research efforts on the GO-FLOW approach are reported in references Kobayashi (1988, 1989) Zupei et al (2001), Hashim et al (2013), Muhammad et al (2013). Among these works, the reliability is mainly calculated based on the simulation approach (Matsuoka and Kobayashi, 1989;Hashim et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study, CCF has been regarded as a crucial problem . However, the approach in Muhammad et al (2013) must be calculated for each time interval, and the CCF also requires additional consideration. The complicated parts of the current approach make it unavailable for use in methodology calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%