2017
DOI: 10.1111/infi.12119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common correlated effects and international risk sharing

Abstract: Correct assessment of consumption risk and its international diversification has important policy implications. However, existing studies of international risk sharing rely on the unrealistic assumptions that all economies are characterized by symmetric preferences and uniform transmission of global shocks. We relax these homogeneity constraints and compare our proposed approach with the conventional ones using a 44‐year panel of 120 countries. Our results confirm that consumption is only partially smoothed in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, they robustify the estimation against heterogeneous preferences and variation in the extent of global shocks transmitted to individual countries. Further merits of this methodology relative to the conventional one are discussed in depth by Fuleky et al ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, they robustify the estimation against heterogeneous preferences and variation in the extent of global shocks transmitted to individual countries. Further merits of this methodology relative to the conventional one are discussed in depth by Fuleky et al ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown by Fuleky et al (2018) the standard models appear too restrictive and sources of heterogeneity need to be further investigated. Firstly, the smoothing channels can vary widely across countries and this affects the magnitude of the impact of income shocks on consumption.…”
Section: Limits Of the Standard Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examine four alternative models (all variables are in log) following Fuleky et al (2018) in order to introduce various sources of heterogeneity. We start with the most constrained model and then relax the constraints one by one.…”
Section: Four Models Testedmentioning
confidence: 99%