2011
DOI: 10.1007/s13753-011-0002-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common criteria for the assessment of critical infrastructures

Abstract: Society is reliant on infrastructure services, such as information and communication technology, energy, water, and food supply, but also on governmental, cultural, and search and rescue organizations. The goal of project Kritis-KAT at the Federal Office of Civil Protection and Disaster Assistance in Germany is the development of generic criteria for the identification and evaluation of infrastructures regarded as "critical" for society. Acknowledging that full protection against all threats and cascading effe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a context of risks, one of the most significant and pervasive risk is the occurrence of failures due to the so-called domino effects or cascading effects. In a situation of strong intra-dependence and strong interdependence, respectively within and between critical infrastructures, cascading effects can lead to different impact entry-points [14,39] which complicate the understanding of the damage processes. Moreover, society currently cannot afford the costs associated with absolute protection against all cascading effects [40] and this may not even be feasible [14].…”
Section: A Review Of Methodologies For Assessing the Interdependenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a context of risks, one of the most significant and pervasive risk is the occurrence of failures due to the so-called domino effects or cascading effects. In a situation of strong intra-dependence and strong interdependence, respectively within and between critical infrastructures, cascading effects can lead to different impact entry-points [14,39] which complicate the understanding of the damage processes. Moreover, society currently cannot afford the costs associated with absolute protection against all cascading effects [40] and this may not even be feasible [14].…”
Section: A Review Of Methodologies For Assessing the Interdependenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Getting a full picture on failures, by capturing second and third order consequences as well [14]; -Integrating all the interdependencies, irrespective of whether they are due to processes within the system, to external changes in the system's environment [15] or to unexpected or unforeseeable events [11]; -Determining failures due to domino effects between different urban technical networks considered to be critical [16].…”
Section: City Critical Infrastructures and Risks: An Essential Triptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electricity has been available to consumers as a quasiinvisible force [58] and, for decades, as an unquestioned resource [60]. The currently passive consumption will increasingly become a matter of liability and daily attention, as the organization of generation, transport, and distribution of electricity is transformed.…”
Section: Consumersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and not the damage to the cables and transformation stations itself. Furthermore, the secondary effects of outage outside the flooded area and interdependencies and cascading effects to other sectors are relevant to consider (Fekete 2011). Failure of, for example, the power network may affect a wide range of other infrastructures, e.g.…”
Section: Approach To the Analysis Of CI Vulnerabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%