Common elements of service delivery models that optimise quality of life and health service use among older people with advanced progressive conditions: a tertiary systematic review

Abstract

IntroductionHealth and social care services worldwide need to support ageing populations to live well with advanced progressive conditions while adapting to functional decline and finitude. We aimed to identify and map common elements of effective geriatric and palliative care services and consider their scalability and generalisability to high, middle and low-income countries.MethodsTertiary systematic review (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, Embase, January 2000–October 2019) of studies in geriatric or palliative care that demonstrated improved quality of life and/or health service use outcomes among older people with advanced progressive conditions. Using frameworks for health system analysis, service elements were identified. We used a staged, iterative process to develop a ‘common components’ logic model and consulted experts in geriatric or palliative care from high, middle and low-income countries on its scalability.Results78 studies (59 geriatric and 19 palliative) spanning all WHO regions were included. Data were available from 17 739 participants. Nearly half the studies recruited patients with heart failure (n=36) and one-third recruited patients with mixed diagnoses (n=26). Common service elements (≥80% of studies) included collaborative working, ongoing assessment, active patient participation, patient/family education and patient self-management. Effective services incorporated patient engagement, patient goal-driven care and the centrality of patient needs. Stakeholders (n=20) emphasised that wider implementation of such services would require access to skilled, multidisciplinary teams with sufficient resource to meet patients’ needs. Identified barriers to scalability included the political and societal will to invest in and prioritise palliative and geriatric care for older people, alongside geographical and socioeconomic factors.ConclusionOur logic model combines elements of effective services to achieve optimal quality of life and health service use among older people with advanced progressive conditions. The model transcends current best practice in geriatric and palliative care and applies across the care continuum, from prevention of functional decline to end-of-life care.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020150252.

The impact of long-term care interventions on healthcare utilisation among older persons: a scoping review of reviews

“…Most interventions involved multidisciplinary teams of various health, social care, and community-based providers, supporting findings and recommendations elsewhere [ 7 , 20 ]. Indeed, the involvement of relevant providers in caring for and providing LTC services for older persons is essential in ensuring that all their needs are adequately assessed and addressed in an integrated and coordinated approach [ 12 , 68 ].…”

“…While substantial evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of various LTC interventions [ 15 – 18 ], there are conflicting findings. To our knowledge, few studies have mapped the characteristics of LTC interventions [ 19 , 20 ], but the impact of LTC interventions on healthcare utilisation is unknown. Owing to the abundance of knowledge on LTC interventions, we augmented and advanced the existing knowledge through a comprehensive scoping review focused on systematic reviews with meta-analyses.…”

How is community based ‘out-of-hours’ care provided to patients with advanced illness near the end of life: A systematic review of care provision

“…A recent review has highlighted the importance of a capable workforce that works collaboratively across disciplinary boundaries, to provide comprehensive and ongoing multidimensional assessment. 108 Further research is also needed on models of integrated working out-of-hours between specialist and general services for palliative care, to ensure care provided is well coordinated.…”

Evidence-based models of rural palliative care: A systematic review

“…Not dissimilar to urban populations, rural palliative care delivery needs to be well coordinated and overseen or led by clinicians with specialist palliative care expertise. [63][64][65][66] Rural patients and families also require information and support to optimise their ability to manage, understand their illness trajectory, and promote self-advocacy. Preliminary data suggests these elements of care may be cost effective.…”